Mayflower District Court
#nexussomega-v-b3nxxxx
This is the start of #nexussomega-v-b3nxxxx channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-04 01:43 a.m. @krabz has added @Dark Stranger to the case channel.
Case Modified
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 03:11 a.m.
I request to add my client @corcaine to this channel. Additionally I request your honor Sadoimpacto to send out summons.
CC:@meowiitten @krabz
CC:
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-04 09:54 a.m. @meowiitten has added @corcaine to the case channel.
Case Modified
Dark StrangerI request to add my client @corcaine to this channel. Additionally I request your honor Sadoimpacto to send out summons. CC: @meowiitten @krabz
meowiitten 2025-03-04 09:55 a.m.DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK THATUNIVERSAL, Plaintiff, -against- ADOREDAGGER, Defendant. Case No. CV-114-25 SUMMONS Plaintiff designates Clark County as the place of tri... 
meowiitten 2025-03-04 09:55 a.m.
Draft a copy for me
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 09:58 a.m.@meowiitten
Dark StrangerClick to see attachment.
meowiitten 2025-03-04 09:58 a.m.
PDF
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 09:59 a.m.@š✰
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 10:00 a.m.
oops
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 10:00 a.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-04 10:04 a.m. @meowiitten has added @Obama to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-03-04 10:05 a.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: Having executed the summons contained herein upon the defendant, the defendant shall file their answer or other responsive pleading by March 9, 2025, at 11:59 PM. Failure to comply may result in a default judgment or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/4/2025.
@Dark Stranger @Obama
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-04 10:05 a.m.
I request the timezone to be specified your honor
meowiitten 2025-03-04 10:06 a.m.
EST
Dark Stranger 2025-03-04 10:06 a.m.
Thankyou
Obama 2025-03-04 10:20 a.m.
Ahh a sunday yeah that alright
Obama 2025-03-04 10:22 a.m.
Oh wai
Obama 2025-03-04 10:22 a.m.
Wait
Obama 2025-03-04 10:22 a.m.
Im here
ObamaAhh a sunday yeah that alright
meowiitten 2025-03-04 10:27 a.m.
Counsel?
meowiitten 2025-03-04 11:45 a.m.
/add target:@huddy.
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-04 11:46 a.m. @meowiitten has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
huddy. 2025-03-04 11:46 a.m.
Howdy folks.
huddy. 2025-03-04 11:46 a.m.
March 9th sounds good.
corcaine 2025-03-04 07:17 p.m.
Perfect right after my birthday 
huddy. 2025-03-05 02:47 a.m.
Ah wel sorry to have to ruin your special day 
corcainePerfect right after my birthday
Obama 2025-03-05 08:04 a.m.
better then on tbh 
Obama 2025-03-05 11:45 a.m.@corcaine how u feelin
Obamameowiitten 2025-03-05 12:01 p.m.
Are you going to find a lawyer
huddy. 2025-03-05 12:58 p.m.
Dude what
huddy. 2025-03-05 12:58 p.m.
I'm his lawyer
meowiitten 2025-03-05 01:19 p.m.
True
huddy.Dude what
meowiitten 2025-03-05 01:30 p.m.
Don’t dude what me Boy
sadoimpactoDon’t dude what me Boy
Obama 2025-03-05 01:32 p.m.
what u on abt dude
Obama 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
anyways
Obama 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
are we all good here?
Obamawhat u on abt dude
meowiitten 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
Your Honor* Sir*
Obama 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
sorry this my first court or whatever
Obama 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
never had it before
meowiitten 2025-03-05 01:33 p.m.
I forgive you
sadoimpactoI forgive you
Obama 2025-03-05 01:45 p.m.
this is kinda excitiing you know
huddy. 2025-03-05 03:10 p.m.@Dark Stranger @meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-05 03:10 p.m.
huddy.Click to see attachment.
meowiitten 2025-03-05 04:16 p.m.
In the future you are to file a proposed order alongside all motions that are directed to me per my standing order regarding civil cases. I also do not see any certification statement that you met and conferred with opposing counsel before filing this motion. Regardless, the motion is denied for the reasons set forth in my order below:
OPINION AND ORDER
@huddy. @Dark Stranger
188.85 KB
huddy. 2025-03-05 04:16 p.m.
' I also do not see any certification statement that you met and conferred with opposing counsel before filing this motion.' ?
meowiitten 2025-03-05 04:17 p.m.
Clearly you did not read my standing order
meowiitten 2025-03-05 04:17 p.m.
I'm not going to read it for you
huddy. 2025-03-05 04:18 p.m.
Ah I have just read, very interesting.
huddy. 2025-03-05 04:18 p.m.
Well our complaint answer is above.
huddy. 2025-03-05 04:21 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-03-05 04:27 p.m.PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from March 5, 2025, concluding on March 15, 2024 at 11:59 PM EST barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By March 10, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. Trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/5/2025.
cc:@huddy. @Dark Stranger
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-08 04:37 p.m.
I request the court to extend the deadline for discovery and the final draft. I have been busy with my uni projects and stuff, I will try to submit it early if I get some time.
cc:@meowiitten @huddy.
cc:
meowiitten 2025-03-08 04:38 p.m.
Denied
Obama 2025-03-08 04:52 p.m.
Wassup
sadoimpactoDenied
huddy. 2025-03-08 04:55 p.m.
Thank you for upholding the integrity of the law.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 11:12 a.m.
Just to be clear, I do not need to send and discuss the Discovery draft to the opposing counsel before I submit it to the court, right ??
@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-09 11:14 a.m.
Hell naw
Obama 2025-03-09 11:19 a.m.
Well
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:11 p.m.@meowiitten I request your honor to extend the deadline by just 2 days for final draft, I am really overwhelmed with my university projects and tests at this moment.
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:12 p.m.
Denied again
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:12 p.m.
2 DAYS
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:12 p.m.
PLEASE
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:12 p.m.
You had a whole weekend + 2 days ontop of that
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:12 p.m.
And you have the entire day tomorrow
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:13 p.m.
You can spare 5-10 minutes of your free time
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:13 p.m.
Yeah, I have to do 11 hours of classes everyday (including WEEKENDS) and then I had and have various projects and tests lined up.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:13 p.m.
It all ends on 11th
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:14 p.m.
I have classes on saturdays and sundays, yes
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:21 p.m.
So do I and every other lawyer in this State...
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:22 p.m.
If you added up all the time that you responded to my DMs regarding the motion, begged an opposing counsel for a template and requested extensions here, you could have written your response.
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:22 p.m.
24 hours - (11 hours of classes + 8 hours of sleep + 2 hours of other responsibilities) = at least 3 hours of free time
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:23 p.m.
Also 11 hours of classes is child abuse
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:23 p.m.
If you spend 20 minutes working that’s only 11.1% of those 3 hours
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:24 p.m.
You have 6 hours of free time across 2 days
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:25 p.m.
And you will have 15 hours total after 5 days(edited)
meowiitten 2025-03-09 03:25 p.m.
That’s 1 hour and 40 minutes you could’ve spent working on discovery
huddy.If you added up all the time that you responded to my DMs regarding the motion, begged an opposing counsel for a template and requested extensions here, you could have written your...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:42 p.m.
I would remind you to not use such words as "begged" in here, also bcs I did not do anything of such sort, or is just asking someone begging in your eyes ??
sadoimpacto24 hours - (11 hours of classes + 8 hours of sleep + 2 hours of other responsibilities) = at least 3 hours of free time
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:43 p.m.
11 hours of classes + 5 hours of sleep + 2 hours of other responsibilities + 6 - 7 hours spend on projects and studying for test
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:43 p.m.
I got a few hours today, but then we had an MNG training which I had to attend
huddy.Also 11 hours of classes is child abuse
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:44 p.m.
ikr 
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:44 p.m.
Well that's clearly not true because otherwise you'd kill yourself and you wouldn't be on Roblox.
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:44 p.m.
You don't have 11 hours of classes and 7 hours of test revision.
huddy.Well that's clearly not true because otherwise you'd kill yourself and you wouldn't be on Roblox.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:44 p.m.
well the teachers wake up at fucking last week of deadline to give us all the porjects and tests at once
huddy. 2025-03-09 03:45 p.m.
Please calm down.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-09 03:45 p.m.
You are the one alleging that I am lying
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 11:59 a.m.@meowiitten The standing order says that I need to provide all the evidences as google drive link, when I upload a picture there it says no preview available. Should I put the pictures with gyazo or imgur ?? Also the District court rules says that medal links are acceptable for video evidence, may I use medal link ??
meowiitten 2025-03-10 12:02 p.m.
Yup
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 12:24 p.m.
cc @meowiitten @huddy.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 12:31 p.m.@meowiitten Your honor, can you add RebelPilot09 here ? They are a witness to this.
meowiitten 2025-03-10 12:31 p.m.
No
meowiitten 2025-03-10 12:32 p.m.
This is discovery
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 12:32 p.m.
If the opposing counsel and court has no objections then the plaintiff is ready to move to trial.
Dark Strangerhuddy. 2025-03-10 01:04 p.m.
Proud of you bro
huddy. 2025-03-10 01:04 p.m.
knew you could do it
Dark StrangerIf the opposing counsel and court has no objections then the plaintiff is ready to move to trial.
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:25 p.m.@huddy.
sadoimpactohuddy. 2025-03-10 01:40 p.m.
Yeah
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:40 p.m.@Dark Stranger @huddy. Pick a day for trial within the week (not Sunday)
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:40 p.m.
All times EST
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 01:41 p.m.
Tomorrow 10:30 EST ??
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 01:41 p.m.
AM
Dark StrangerTomorrow 10:30 EST ??
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:42 p.m.
You should pick a day that your witnesses can be there
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:42 p.m.
Or get affidavits from them and present it at trial
sadoimpactoYou should pick a day that your witnesses can be there
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 01:45 p.m.
did EST change to EDT ?
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:48 p.m.
Yes
meowiitten 2025-03-10 01:48 p.m.
EDT
Dark StrangerTomorrow 10:30 EST ??
huddy. 2025-03-10 01:57 p.m.
Tuesday Morning??
huddy. 2025-03-10 01:57 p.m.
What happened to your 11 hours of school
huddy.What happened to your 11 hours of school
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 01:57 p.m.
I am not EST
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 01:57 p.m.
That is at like 10pm for me
huddy. 2025-03-10 01:59 p.m.
Right and you presume that I, my clients and the Justice are simply readily available an hour and a half before midday on a Tuesday...
huddy. 2025-03-10 01:59 p.m.
Friday or Weekend would be much better.
meowiitten 2025-03-10 02:00 p.m.
Sunday is my one day of the week that I’m truly free and I don’t want to be bothered then so if you wanna do a weekend do Friday or Saturday
huddy.Right and you presume that I, my clients and the Justice are simply readily available an hour and a half before midday on a Tuesday...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 02:00 p.m.
I simply proposed a time. If you open your eyes you can see "??" after the time
sadoimpactoSunday is my one day of the week that I’m truly free and I don’t want to be bothered then so if you wanna do a weekend do Friday or Saturday
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 02:00 p.m.
Friday works for me, I will consult my client and witness about it before confirming
huddy. 2025-03-10 02:40 p.m.
Almost forgot about this:
Motion to Dismiss Count 3
cc:@Dark Stranger @meowiitten
cc:
huddy. 2025-03-10 02:40 p.m.
As per your rules, I have already presented and discussed this motion with opposing counsel over 24 hours ago, yet we failed to reach an agreement.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 03:40 p.m.
Will Friday, March 14, 2025 at 4:45 p.m. work ??
@huddy. @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-10 03:45 p.m.
Yeah
meowiitten 2025-03-10 03:45 p.m.
I’ll do a scheduling order later
meowiitten 2025-03-10 03:45 p.m.
If @huddy.
Dark StrangerWill Friday, March 14, 2025 at 4:45 p.m. work ?? @huddy. @meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-10 03:53 p.m.
Absolutely not, sorry.
huddy. 2025-03-10 03:53 p.m.
Perhaps earlier
huddy.Perhaps earlier
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 03:54 p.m.
My witness is not available earlier
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 03:54 p.m.
and maybe not even me
huddy.Almost forgot about this: Motion to Dismiss Count 3 cc: @Dark Stranger @meowiitten
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 03:55 p.m.@meowiitten Your honor, are you gonna respond to this like before ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 03:55 p.m.
Or do I need to file a response ?
huddy.Almost forgot about this: Motion to Dismiss Count 3 cc: @Dark Stranger @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-10 03:56 p.m.
I can’t write a paper order but this is denied
sadoimpactoI can’t write a paper order but this is denied
huddy. 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
Why??
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
Im in for Saturday
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
18:00 Berlin time
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
or no
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
wait
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
Friday is much better
Obama 2025-03-10 03:57 p.m.
im not home at Saturday i forgot
huddy. 2025-03-10 03:58 p.m.
You're denying a motion to dismiss a count when not once in Plaintiff's Complaint is a key aspect of the count's definition detailed, and you can't even write a papered order??
Obama 2025-03-10 03:59 p.m.@Dark Stranger are u with us? we can do it earlier then ur time u picked on Friday
Obama 2025-03-10 03:59 p.m.
it would be best for all of us
ObamaDark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:01 p.m.
As I said, the witness is not availble earlier than the time I mentioned and I might also not available
Dark StrangerAs I said, the witness is not availble earlier than the time I mentioned and I might also not available
Obama 2025-03-10 04:01 p.m.
Bruh
huddy. 2025-03-10 04:01 p.m.
Right well I'm not available at the time you mentioned and neither is my witness.(edited)
Obama 2025-03-10 04:01 p.m.
Nexuss can sue me but cant come? or how can i understand that
huddy.Right well I'm not available at the time you mentioned and neither is my witness.(edited)
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:02 p.m.
Excuse me, your witness ??
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:02 p.m.
You did not even file a discovery
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:02 p.m.
you have no witness
huddy. 2025-03-10 04:02 p.m.
Ok this guy is slow
ObamaNexuss can sue me but cant come? or how can i understand that
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:02 p.m.
I have 2 witnesses, the other witness is not available
huddy.You're denying a motion to dismiss a count when not once in Plaintiff's Complaint is a key aspect of the count's definition detailed, and you can't even write a papered order??
meowiitten 2025-03-10 04:03 p.m.
I find that the facts constituting the count and the language in the count itself, while perhaps not using the specific verbiage you mentioned, are sufficient to state the claim(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-10 04:03 p.m.
Sir, the definition literally requires voluntary and intentional actions
huddy. 2025-03-10 04:03 p.m.
That isn't mentioned once
Obama 2025-03-10 04:04 p.m.
Also why do Nexuss need witnesses
huddy. 2025-03-10 04:04 p.m.
How can you sue for assault which requires intention, without alleging intention...
ObamaAlso why do Nexuss need witnesses
Dark Stranger 2025-03-10 04:04 p.m.
We have a witness and we are using it, what do you mean why does my client need one ?
huddy.Sir, the definition literally requires voluntary and intentional actions
meowiitten 2025-03-10 04:07 p.m.
Um
meowiitten 2025-03-10 04:07 p.m.
Violently swinging and killing someone with a crowbar is clearly an intentional act
meowiitten 2025-03-10 04:07 p.m.
Your motion is denied roughly for the same reasons that you first one was denied
meowiitten 2025-03-10 09:25 p.m.@Obama @huddy. @Dark Stranger Any agreement on time of trial?
meowiitten 2025-03-10 09:26 p.m.
If both lawyers can be there, but not the witnesses, then please just get affidavits and we'll conduct an adversarial-style evidentiary hearing based trial
Obama 2025-03-11 02:00 a.m.
Well friday is the only time i can be there in the next 2 weeks
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:18 p.m.@Obama @huddy. @Dark Stranger Any agreement on time of trial?
huddy. 2025-03-12 03:19 p.m.
Nope
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:20 p.m.
You all have until 4:00 PM EST today to give me a time or I’m setting trial for 5:00 PM tomorrow
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:20 p.m.
EDT
Obama 2025-03-12 03:21 p.m.
god ill be asleep by then
Obama 2025-03-12 03:22 p.m.
well if Dark would awnser in here it would be awesome
huddy. 2025-03-12 03:22 p.m.
Ah yes 5pm on a workday
Obama 2025-03-12 03:22 p.m.
it feels like hes waiting till weekend
Obama 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
ahh
Obama 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
there u go
sadoimpactoYou all have until 4:00 PM EST today to give me a time or I’m setting trial for 5:00 PM tomorrow
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
just to confirm it is Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. ?
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
5 or 7
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
I haven’t decided
Dark Strangerjust to confirm it is Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
Is the time correct your honor ?
Obama 2025-03-12 03:23 p.m.
ehm im asleep by then????
Dark StrangerIs the time correct your honor ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:24 p.m.@meowiitten
Dark Strangerjust to confirm it is Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. ?
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:25 p.m.
7 EDT
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:25 p.m.
but yes the time was correct
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:25 p.m.
I can do 5 EDT on friday but I cannot do 7 EDT unless its on Saturday
Obama 2025-03-12 03:27 p.m.
5 EDT i also could on friday
Obama 2025-03-12 03:27 p.m.
on saturday im not home thats why
Obama 2025-03-12 03:27 p.m.@huddy. what u say
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:28 p.m.
I might be on the road on Friday
Obama 2025-03-12 03:28 p.m.
oh
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:29 p.m.
Well 5 EDT is at like 2am for me, so I cannot do it during weekdays at all
Obama 2025-03-12 03:29 p.m.
5EDT is 11PM for me
huddy. 2025-03-12 03:39 p.m.
3pm EDT Friday
Obama 2025-03-12 03:41 p.m.
Could also work
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:54 p.m.
Does not work for me
Obama 2025-03-12 03:54 p.m.
why?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
I have to be working on certain assignments at that time
Obama 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
bruh
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
I have deadlines
Obama 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
so u need to work on it at midnight?
Obama 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
interesting
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
The deadline is at like 1 am
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 03:55 p.m.
so yeah
Obama 2025-03-12 03:56 p.m.
Bruh
Dark StrangerI have to be working on certain assignments at that time
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:59 p.m.
I don’t believe you by the way
meowiitten 2025-03-12 03:59 p.m.
Just so you know
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:02 p.m.
Our normal deadlines are around midnight
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:03 p.m.
and my classes ends at like 6pm
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:03 p.m.
so after coming back and getting fresh and having dinner I work at the projects
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:03 p.m.
until almost the deadline
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:04 p.m.
and it takes even more time sometime and I submit it like 30 - 60mins late
Dark StrangerOur normal deadlines are around midnight
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:08 p.m.
What country do you live in
sadoimpactoWhat country do you live in
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:09 p.m.
I think that is irrelevant
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:09 p.m.
however I am Asian
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:09 p.m.
I think it’s relevant
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:09 p.m.
If you lived in like South Korea
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:09 p.m.
I could understand
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:11 p.m.
Lmfao if he lives in south korea
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:11 p.m.
Also if my 5 PM is your 2 AM then my 4 PM is your 1 AM
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
You just missed the deadline for every assignment by 11 minutes
huddy.Lmfao if he lives in south korea
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
He can’t even
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
Doing the math
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
He’s 4 hours outside that time zone
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
He's probably lying about all this
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
Because no one with such a stressful life would even have roblox or discord
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
let alone become a lawyer and take cases
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:13 p.m. 
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:13 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:14 p.m.@Dark Stranger Are you in India by chance
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:15 p.m.
No Sir
huddy.Because no one with such a stressful life would even have roblox or discord
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:16 p.m.
Typically I dont have so many projects and tests, it just the last 2 weeks of the semester
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:16 p.m.
I just am free after 6pm typically
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:18 p.m.
So you were like hee hee haa haa let me sue someone as I enter my definitely real final assignments
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:18 p.m.
interesting grind mindset
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:18 p.m.
you should just settle
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:18 p.m.
and then focus on irl
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:21 p.m.
I am supposed to get free after this friday so no
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:23 p.m.@huddy. Tomorrow at 7 PM EDT?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:24 p.m.
I cannot do that your honot
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:24 p.m.
honor*
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:24 p.m.
Neither can I
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:26 p.m.
Okay Friday at 7 PM EDT barring I don’t leave to go back to college that day
sadoimpactoOkay Friday at 7 PM EDT barring I don’t leave to go back to college that day
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
DANGGG 1 AM for me and like 3-4 AM for Dark
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
alr
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
well
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
im in then
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
if
Obama 2025-03-12 04:27 p.m.
ig*
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:32 p.m.
I cant do 7EDT on friday
I can do 5EDT
I can only do 7 EDT on Saturdays
I can do 5EDT
I can only do 7 EDT on Saturdays
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:33 p.m.
Why don't we do this over a few days
Dark Stranger 2025-03-12 04:38 p.m.
I can do anytime on Saturday but ig Judge is not free
huddy.Why don't we do this over a few days
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:38 p.m.
It’s literally just like
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:39 p.m.
An evidentiary hearing
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:39 p.m.
Since no one’s witnesses can even be there
huddy. 2025-03-12 04:39 p.m.
Oh that
huddy.Oh that
meowiitten 2025-03-12 04:49 p.m.
Which is why I encouraged everyone to get affidavits
Dark StrangerI can do anytime on Saturday but ig Judge is not free
Obama 2025-03-12 05:22 p.m.
i cant also
Obama 2025-03-12 05:22 p.m.
like i said
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:40 p.m.PAPERLESS SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial tomorrow on March 14, 2025, at 7:00 PM EDT. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/13/2025.
@Obama @Dark Stranger @huddy.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
Just to confirm
Friday, March 14, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. ??
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
Yes
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
In India I believe that is 4:30 AM
sadoimpactoIn India I believe that is 4:30 AM
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
I am not indian
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
But tbf my timezone is kinda similar
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:44 p.m.
What's your timezone?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:45 p.m.
GMT + 5
Dark StrangerGMT + 5
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:45 p.m.
Nepali?(edited)
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:46 p.m.
Chinese?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:46 p.m.
Stop guessing my country
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:46 p.m.
I am not saying
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:46 p.m.
Dude
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:46 p.m.
Why not
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:47 p.m.
No one will find you in a country full of 10 million people I promise you
meowiitten 2025-03-13 09:47 p.m.
The Court is curious
Dark Stranger 2025-03-13 09:48 p.m.
Court can stay curious for now
sadoimpactoNo one will find you in a country full of 10 million people I promise you
huddy. 2025-03-14 03:47 a.m.
billion*
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:06 p.m.@Dark Stranger @huddy. Reminder
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:06 p.m.
7:00 PM EDT
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:09 p.m.
Yes
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:12 p.m.@Honoripedia @Sheriff of Clark County
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:12 p.m.
Can you get me a bailiff
huddy. 2025-03-14 05:21 p.m.
I cannot make this sorry
UserMessage could not be loaded.
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:24 p.m.
huddy.I cannot make this sorry
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:24 p.m.
So when can you
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:24 p.m.
I can't do this weekend at all
huddy.I cannot make this sorry
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:26 p.m.
You inform this like an hour before the hearing ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:26 p.m.
I stayed up for this
Dark StrangerYou inform this like an hour before the hearing ?
huddy. 2025-03-14 05:28 p.m. 
sadoimpactoI can't do this weekend at all
huddy. 2025-03-14 05:29 p.m.
What about monday
huddy. 2025-03-14 05:29 p.m.
or tuesday
huddy.Click to see attachment.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:29 p.m.
That was 2 days ago
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:29 p.m.
it was for yesterday
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:29 p.m.
You did not deny to this official order
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:30 p.m.
Okay so this is what we're going to do
sadoimpactomeowiitten 2025-03-14 05:30 p.m.
This order is vacated
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:31 p.m.
We're going to just do it in here
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:32 p.m.
BEGINNING OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTmeowiitten 2025-03-14 05:32 p.m.
We are here today for trial in the matter of nexussomega versus b3nxxxx. Counsel, please state your appearances for the record. @Dark Stranger @huddy.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-14 05:35 p.m.
Good morning, Your Honor. Counsel for the Plaintiff, NexussOmega, is DarkStranger_000. I am present and ready to proceed.
meowiitten 2025-03-14 05:36 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-15 05:28 a.m.
Good morning, Your Honor. Counsel for the Defendant, B3nxxxx, is JamesMHamilton. I am present and ready to proceed.
meowiitten 2025-03-15 09:43 a.m.@Dark Stranger Please begin with your opening statements.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-15 09:50 a.m.
Good Evening, Your Honor, and may it please the Court. The plaintiff intends to prove that the defendant is responsible for the assault, battery, and wrongful death of the victim within the perimeters of Mersea Car Dealership. To support this claim, we will present video evidence capturing the incident, as well as testimony from witnesses. The evidence will demonstrate that the defendant’s actions were not only unlawful but completely unjustified, causing harm to the victim and ultimately leading to their death. We will show that the defendant should be held accountable for the pain and suffering caused by their actions. I yield, Your Honor.
meowiitten 2025-03-15 10:02 a.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:16 a.m.
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court, we stand in defence of B3NXXXX, who has been unfairly accused of wrongful death, battery, and assault. Whilst Plaintiff paints a dramatic picture of events, the reality is far more complex. Evidence, when analysed, will show that Plaintiff was not an innocent victim, but rather an active participant in an escalating confrontation.
B3NXXXX didn't act out of malice, but in a manner that was legally justified and exaggerated by Plaintiff's claims. We will demonstrate that the Plaintiff initiated the engagement by persistently following my client, ignoring clear indications that they did not wish to interact. Plaintiff's act of following my client up a billboard without consent and attempting to engage in an altercation, will too be shone light upon.
Furthermore, we will challenge the credibility of the Plaintiff’s version of events. The claim that my client intentionally caused the Plaintiff’s injuries lacks sufficient evidence and does not account for external factors such as general hazards or Plaintiff’s own reckless behaviour. Also, the assertion that B3NXXXX’s actions directly resulted in the Plaintiff’s death is speculative at best.
Through witness testimony and evidence, we will establish that this case is not as clear-cut as the Plaintiff wants us to believe. At the conclusion of this trial, we are confident that the evidence will compel you to rule in favour of Defendant.
B3NXXXX didn't act out of malice, but in a manner that was legally justified and exaggerated by Plaintiff's claims. We will demonstrate that the Plaintiff initiated the engagement by persistently following my client, ignoring clear indications that they did not wish to interact. Plaintiff's act of following my client up a billboard without consent and attempting to engage in an altercation, will too be shone light upon.
Furthermore, we will challenge the credibility of the Plaintiff’s version of events. The claim that my client intentionally caused the Plaintiff’s injuries lacks sufficient evidence and does not account for external factors such as general hazards or Plaintiff’s own reckless behaviour. Also, the assertion that B3NXXXX’s actions directly resulted in the Plaintiff’s death is speculative at best.
Through witness testimony and evidence, we will establish that this case is not as clear-cut as the Plaintiff wants us to believe. At the conclusion of this trial, we are confident that the evidence will compel you to rule in favour of Defendant.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 01:34 p.m.@meowiitten
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 03:58 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-16 03:59 p.m.@Dark Stranger Do you have a witness to call?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 03:59 p.m.
Yes Your Honor
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 03:59 p.m.
The Victim and an eye witness
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:00 p.m.
Which one are you calling first?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:02 p.m.
The eye witness your honor
Dark StrangerThe eye witness your honor
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:02 p.m.
What’s their username?
sadoimpactoWhat’s their username?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:02 p.m.@rebel
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-16 04:02 p.m. @meowiitten has added @rebel to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:03 p.m.@rebel Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
sadoimpacto
rebel 2025-03-16 04:03 p.m.
I do!
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:04 p.m.@Dark Stranger Your witness.
DIRECT-EXAMINATION OF REBEPILOT09 BY PLAINTIFF
rebelI do!
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:04 p.m.
Please state your Roblox Username for the record.
sadoimpactoDIRECT-EXAMINATION OF REBEPILOT09 BY PLAINTIFFmeowiitten 2025-03-16 04:05 p.m.
(After this is over, I will prompt you for any objections or motions to strike) @huddy.
Dark StrangerPlease state your Roblox Username for the record.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:09 p.m.
RebelPilot09
rebelRebelPilot09
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:10 p.m.
Are you a resident of Clark County, Mayflower?
Dark StrangerAre you a resident of Clark County, Mayflower?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:10 p.m.
Yes, I am.
rebelYes, I am.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:10 p.m.
How do you know the Plaintiff, NexussOmega?
Dark StrangerHow do you know the Plaintiff, NexussOmega?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:10 p.m.
I witnessed his murder in Mersea, that's all really.
rebelI witnessed his murder in Mersea, that's all really.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:11 p.m.
On February 26th, 2025, where were you located when you first saw the Plaintiff and the Defendant?
Dark StrangerOn February 26th, 2025, where were you located when you first saw the Plaintiff and the Defendant?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:11 p.m.
Mersea Car Dealership in Mersea Township, Clark County, MF.
rebelMersea Car Dealership in Mersea Township, Clark County, MF.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:11 p.m.
Can you describe the circumstances under which you first saw the Plaintiff and the Defendant that day?
Dark StrangerCan you describe the circumstances under which you first saw the Plaintiff and the Defendant that day?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:12 p.m.
The defendant was assaulting the plaintiff.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:12 p.m.
That's the circumstance.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:12 p.m.
I was present toward the end of the assault when it eventually killed the plaintiff.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
That's the first sighting.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
Okay
rebel 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
I did eventually see the plaintiff again.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
He had respawned and returned to MCD.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
Alright
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
Moving on
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:13 p.m.
Were you able to observe the Defendant’s behavior when he first encountered the Plaintiff near the Mersea Car Dealership?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:14 p.m.
Given that I've seen the evidence, I did not see the first assault. I was only witness to the second assault, which lead to the plaintiff's death,
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:14 p.m.
Did you witness the Defendant strike the Plaintiff with a crowbar at that time?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:15 p.m.
The second assault to be clear, since you did not witness the first one/
rebel 2025-03-16 04:15 p.m.
Yes, I did. He assaulted the plaintiff, then headed toward his vehicle.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:15 p.m.
or a vehicle
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:15 p.m.
Did the Plaintiff appear to be injured?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
I believe so?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
Yes
rebel 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
He was.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
When the Defendant struck the Plaintiff with the crowbar for the second time, were you able to see it clearly?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
Yes. I did.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:16 p.m.
What happened immediately after the second strike? Did the Plaintiff appear to be seriously injured?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:17 p.m.
(Asking again, to be clear)
rebel 2025-03-16 04:17 p.m.
I believe following the second strike he was killed.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:17 p.m.
I was inclined to shoot the suspect, given I was armed.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:17 p.m.
However I chose not to, as the assault had concluded by then
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:17 p.m.
Can you confirm whether the Plaintiff was alive or dead after the final strike by the Defendant?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:18 p.m.
The final strike did kill the plaintiff, I can confirm that.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:18 p.m.
Based on your observations, do you believe that the Defendant intentionally caused harm to the Plaintiff during these encounters?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
1
Yes, the assaults were targetted. Premeditated? I would say no. However, he did intentionally and with malice, assault the plaintiff with a blunt weapon until he was killed.
1Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
Do you believe the Plaintiff’s death was directly caused by the Defendant’s actions?
Dark StrangerDid the Plaintiff appear to be injured?
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
Objection
rebel 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
I believe so, yes. How else would he have died?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
Thankyou
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.
Thats all from my side @meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:19 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:20 p.m.
Speculative, he has no clue if he was injured or not because you can't see injuries in Roblox
rebel 2025-03-16 04:20 p.m.
love u guys also hi hamilton didnt know u were the defense attorney
rebelYes, the assaults were targetted. Premeditated? I would say no. However, he did intentionally and with malice, assault the plaintiff with a blunt weapon until he was killed.
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:20 p.m.
Objection once again, speculative
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:20 p.m.
How can a eye witness claim that someone intentionally and with malice did something, or comment on premeditation
huddy.Speculative, he has no clue if he was injured or not because you can't see injuries in Roblox
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
It is not speculative, the evidence provides that the witness saw that the plaintiff fell down after getting hit
huddy.How can a eye witness claim that someone intentionally and with malice did something, or comment on premeditation
rebel 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
1
Because the nature of the attack deemed it so. He spontaneously attacked the plaintiff without any good reason.
1rebelI believe so, yes. How else would he have died?
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
Objection, speculative
Dark StrangerIt is not speculative, the evidence provides that the witness saw that the plaintiff fell down after getting hit
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
Witness isn't here to comment on evidence, he's an eye witness to say what he saw
huddy.Objection, speculative
rebel 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
I watched him die.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.
That's not speculative.
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:21 p.m.@meowiitten hop on G
rebel 2025-03-16 04:22 p.m.
I watched the defendant murder the plaintiff in cold blood.
huddy.Witness isn't here to comment on evidence, he's an eye witness to say what he saw
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:22 p.m.
He SAW the Plaintiff fall on the ground, which can be PROVEN by the evidence.
rebelBecause the nature of the attack deemed it so. He spontaneously attacked the plaintiff without any good reason.
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:22 p.m.
Speculative, you have no clue as to the reason
rebel 2025-03-16 04:22 p.m.
I would directly associate the defendant's acts with the plaintiff's death
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:22 p.m.@meowiitten can my objections be ruled on?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:23 p.m.
How can my testimony be speculative? I watched the man die for fuck's sake!
rebel 2025-03-16 04:23 p.m.
for reference, said man in my last sentence is the plaintiff
rebel 2025-03-16 04:24 p.m.
i rest my case
huddy.Objection, speculative
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:26 p.m.
The witness literally saw the plaintiff die from the last strike of the defendant's crowbar as they mentioned. This is not speculative.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:27 p.m.
Whilst I'm unable to comment on premeditation and malice, I can confirm that I witnessed a cold-hearted murder of an innocent civilian in the streets of Mersea, yet another instance of horrific crime in that town.
rebeli rest my case
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:27 p.m.
You have no case to make, you are a witness - you are here to answer questions not make a case on behalf of the Plaintiff.
rebelWhilst I'm unable to comment on premeditation and malice, I can confirm that I witnessed a cold-hearted murder of an innocent civilian in the streets of Mersea, yet another instanc...
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:27 p.m.
You have no clue as to the context or the fact that the civilian was 'innocent' or that it was 'cold-hearted'. This is all your personal opinion and speculations.
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:27 p.m.
I ask the Judge to call us to order
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:28 p.m.@rebel You will only speak when spoken to on examination by the attorney. If another attorney interrupts, then you will stop speaking.
huddy.Speculative, he has no clue if he was injured or not because you can't see injuries in Roblox
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:29 p.m.
Every witness answer down from here is stricken, minus the objections which are TBD.(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:29 p.m.
Thank you.
huddy.Speculative, he has no clue if he was injured or not because you can't see injuries in Roblox
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:32 p.m.
Overruled.
huddy.Objection once again, speculative
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:32 p.m.
Sustained.
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:33 p.m.@huddy. @rebel Alright, your witness.
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:34 p.m.
I believe you honor there one more objection
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
Dark StrangerI believe you honor there one more objection
rebel 2025-03-16 04:34 p.m.
multiple
rebel 2025-03-16 04:34 p.m.
he did object to my further, albeit unprompted, dialogue
rebelBecause the nature of the attack deemed it so. He spontaneously attacked the plaintiff without any good reason.
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:34 p.m.
Sustained in-part, only as to "without any good reason."
rebelhe did object to my further, albeit unprompted, dialogue
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:35 p.m.
Again, do not speak until spoken to by the examining attorney
huddy.Objection, speculative
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:35 p.m.
Your honor, this one as well
rebel 2025-03-16 04:35 p.m.
Your honor, I have to leave soon.
Dark StrangerYour honor, this one as well
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:36 p.m.
Overruled
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:36 p.m.
CROSS-EXAMINATION OF REBEPILOT09 BY DEFENSEmeowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-03-16 04:36 p.m.@huddy. @rebel
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:49 p.m.@rebel Did you have a view of what went on up in the billboard?
huddy.rebel 2025-03-16 04:52 p.m.
No.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:52 p.m.
As mentioned to the plaintiff's attorney, I only witnessed the second assault.
rebel 2025-03-16 04:52 p.m.
The fatal one.
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:54 p.m.@rebel So all you saw was Defendant allegedly beating Plaintiff and Plaintiff dying?
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:54 p.m.
Objection
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:54 p.m.
Leading
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:54 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:55 p.m.
?
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:55 p.m.
Witness claims he only saw the second assault, which was when Plaintiff died...
huddy. 2025-03-16 04:56 p.m.
Unless that was part of third assault, in which case Witness did not see it as he just claimed he only saw the second assault, so Witness did not see the death then...?
rebel 2025-03-16 04:56 p.m.
How many assaults?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:57 p.m.@meowiitten I request you honor to rule on my objection
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 04:57 p.m.
your*
huddy. 2025-03-16 05:04 p.m.
I am going offline but I'll ask the following:
1. Plaintiff stood next to you and saw you talking on the radio. Did he at any point in time ask you to inform the police of an assault or ask for help?
1. Plaintiff stood next to you and saw you talking on the radio. Did he at any point in time ask you to inform the police of an assault or ask for help?
huddy. 2025-03-16 05:05 p.m.
2. You claim to personally have seen Defendant hit Plaintiff - did you at any point in time radio for law enforcement assistance or report the incident? Did you not find it worthy of report?
huddy. 2025-03-16 05:06 p.m.
3. Does this image show you inside/behind a vehicle whilst the alleged attack is taking place, out of the line of sight?(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-16 05:07 p.m.
4. Did you or did you not begin to run away from the incident, losing your line of sight, just before Defendant died?
huddy.2. You claim to personally have seen Defendant hit Plaintiff - did you at any point in time radio for law enforcement assistance or report the incident? Did you not find it worthy ...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 05:10 p.m.
Objection
Compound Question
Compound Question
huddy.3. Does this image show you inside/behind a vehicle whilst the alleged attack is taking place, out of the line of sight?(edited)
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 05:11 p.m.
Objection
The message edited, which is against the rules.
The message edited, which is against the rules.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 05:11 p.m.@meowiitten
Dark StrangerObjection Compound Question
meowiitten 2025-03-16 06:31 p.m.
Sustained. @huddy. Rephrase
Dark StrangerObjection The message edited, which is against the rules.
meowiitten 2025-03-16 06:31 p.m.
It’s fine
meowiitten 2025-03-16 06:31 p.m.
Only because he didn’t answer the question yet
sadoimpactoOnly because he didn’t answer the question yet
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 06:35 p.m.
Your honor, what if he edits the question again after the witness answers ??
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 06:35 p.m.
Like change the wording a little
Dark Stranger 2025-03-16 06:35 p.m.
We would not notice
meowiitten 2025-03-16 06:37 p.m.
I have logs
Dark StrangerWe would not notice
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:39 a.m.
1. There are logs
2. I added a number in front of the question for the ease of your witness
2. I added a number in front of the question for the ease of your witness
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:39 a.m.@rebel Did he at any point in time ask you to inform the police of an assault or ask for help?
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:39 a.m.
Oh right I get the compound bit
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:39 a.m.
Withdrawn.
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:40 a.m.@rebel Did he at any point in time ask you to inform the police of an assault?
huddy.rebel 2025-03-17 01:37 p.m.
as far as i can remember, no. he did approach me but i can't remember what he asked
rebelas far as i can remember, no. he did approach me but i can't remember what he asked
huddy. 2025-03-17 01:42 p.m.
Did you at any point lose your line of sight whilst the attack took place?
huddy.Did you at any point lose your line of sight whilst the attack took place?
rebel 2025-03-17 01:42 p.m.
I don't recall.
huddy. 2025-03-17 01:45 p.m.
Does this image show you not being on seen and unable to see the incident?
huddy.Does this image show you not being on seen and unable to see the incident?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 01:50 p.m.
Objection
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 01:50 p.m.
Leading
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 01:51 p.m.@meowiitten
Dark StrangerObjection
meowiitten 2025-03-17 01:52 p.m.
He can lead on cross examination
huddy.Does this image show you not being on seen and unable to see the incident?
rebel 2025-03-17 01:56 p.m.
this took place some time ago. This is also only his perspective. this doesnt represent what i saw
rebel 2025-03-17 01:57 p.m.
i witnessed the murder of the plaintiff
rebel 2025-03-17 01:58 p.m.
as i said, i don't recall losing line of sight
rebelthis took place some time ago. This is also only his perspective. this doesnt represent what i saw
huddy. 2025-03-17 02:11 p.m.
So a video showing you literally standing behind a van, represents you seeing Plaintiff being murdered?
huddy.So a video showing you literally standing behind a van, represents you seeing Plaintiff being murdered?
rebel 2025-03-17 02:14 p.m.
given that i'm in 3rd person, hypothetically yes
rebel 2025-03-17 02:14 p.m.
if my camera was zoomed out enough
rebel 2025-03-17 02:15 p.m.
again this was some time ago, specifics like that don't come back to me, given i have more important things on my mind
rebel 2025-03-17 02:16 p.m.
real life matters per say
rebel 2025-03-17 02:16 p.m.
i am not devaluing the plaintiff's murder
rebel 2025-03-17 02:16 p.m.
but it's been some time and
rebel 2025-03-17 02:16 p.m.
you'd rather i answer truthfully
huddy. 2025-03-17 02:17 p.m.
Hypothetically?
rebel 2025-03-17 02:17 p.m.
i cannot comment on this given the time since
rebel 2025-03-17 02:17 p.m.
i have no proper answer i can return
rebel 2025-03-17 02:17 p.m.
i request you move onto the next question
rebeli request you move onto the next question
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:06 p.m.
Upon allegedly seeing the death, despite being behind a van, did you report the incident to law enforcement?
huddy.Upon allegedly seeing the death, despite being behind a van, did you report the incident to law enforcement?
rebel 2025-03-17 03:10 p.m.
I did not. This was not out of malice, but due to an absence of officers, fear of reprecussions at the hands of criminals, and ongoing real-life conversation. My priorities were aligned primarily with real-world proceedings that I'm not willing to disclose here, thank you.
rebelI did not. This was not out of malice, but due to an absence of officers, fear of reprecussions at the hands of criminals, and ongoing real-life conversation. My priorities were al...
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:17 p.m.1
You feared repercussions at the hands of criminals for reporting an alleged crime, which you recently referred to as a 'targeted assault with intention and malice', into your radio?
1huddy.You feared repercussions at the hands of criminals for reporting an alleged crime, which you recently referred to as a 'targeted assault with intention and malice', into your radio...
rebel 2025-03-17 03:18 p.m.
Again, I'm unclear of the circumstances. You said yourself that I'm not here to review evidence. I'm attempting to recall off the top of my head. If I contradict myself or have lapses in memory, sobeit.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:18 p.m.
You'll have to be less overtly specific, as this incident took place some time ago, and I've witnessed much more since then.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:18 p.m.
Information blurs, you of all people should know this given the nature of Clark County
rebel 2025-03-17 03:18 p.m.
and its horrific crime rates
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:19 p.m.1
You feared repercussions at the hands of an individual holding a crowbar, leading you not to report this action into your radio despite it being heinous according to you, though you just told us that you were armed and capable of shooting the suspect?
1huddy. 2025-03-17 03:20 p.m.@rebel
huddy.You feared repercussions at the hands of an individual holding a crowbar, leading you not to report this action into your radio despite it being heinous according to you, though yo...
rebel 2025-03-17 03:21 p.m.
Remind me, where did I report this as heinous into my radio? I can't recall.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:21 p.m.
And in terms of shooting the suspect, again I was both unsure of reprecussion by others, or of justification given the assault had concluded.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:22 p.m.
I didn't open fire during the assault either out of fear of crossfire, given the defendent's proximity to the plaintiff
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:22 p.m.
You didn't report it into your radio, yet you just spent your examination by Plaintiff denouncing the action and even referred to it as a 'targeted attack'.
huddy.You didn't report it into your radio, yet you just spent your examination by Plaintiff denouncing the action and even referred to it as a 'targeted attack'.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:23 p.m.
Your point?
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:23 p.m.
I am typing my question, refrain from arguing with me.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:23 p.m.
I kept silent in the moment, but now having rethought, it's evident that it was heinous and brutal.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:23 p.m.
I'm not arguing, I'm allowed to respond to what you've stated.
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:27 p.m.
So you, holding a firearm , claim that you didn't report the action which you have just labelled as 'heinous and brutal', due to fear of repercussions at the hands of an individual with a crowbar who was ten times underpowered than you. Yet you were perfectly capable of reporting a robbery (a crime deemed of lesser value than an alleged assault) committed by a criminal with a bat (a weapon identical to the crowbar and capable of causing equal harm) , without fear of repercussion?(edited)
huddy.So you, holding a firearm , claim that you didn't report the action which you have just labelled as 'heinous and brutal', due to fear of repercussions at the hands of an **indiv...(edited)
rebel 2025-03-17 03:29 p.m.
Because the suspect had fled by then. Additionally, so what if I didn't report it on the radio? It's my discretion. Additionally again, it's also worth mentioning that I can't access CW-TAC, and cops rarely use CW-MAID, so even if I had reported the plaintiff's death over the radio, it would've been worthless given that nobody would've actioned on it.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:29 p.m.
You still stand to make no point. What difference is made if I had or hadn't reported his death. This carries no legal retributions.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:30 p.m.
If you're attempting to twist it into me having supported the defendant's attack, you're also wrong. This isn't aiding or abeiting, it's me choosing the right option to handle the assault.
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:30 p.m.1
Witness, is it accurate to say that this action committed by Defendant was not substantial in any way in your thoughts at the time, hence your decision not to report the action?
1huddy. 2025-03-17 03:31 p.m.
I must note that your thoughts and actions have changed dramatically since then...
rebel 2025-03-17 03:32 p.m.
At the time, it wasn't as substantial, given I had real world issues to deal with. However, you do make a correct point, my thoughts have changed since reviewing evidence and looking back on the incident. This is yet another example of how crime in Clark County impacts everyone, and I now view the assault as far more heinous, unprompted, and heartless.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:33 p.m.
Is there any further comments on my morals you want to add, or can we continue focusing on the actual event?
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:35 p.m.1
Witness, is it accurate to say that you were not focused on the incident? I refer you to the fact that you failed to report it into the radio, despite calling other 'crimes' in, were running around during the incident and not directly in front of the incident, stood behind your vehicle and was not present...
1huddy.Witness, is it accurate to say that you were not focused on the incident? I refer you to the fact that you failed to report it into the radio, despite calling other 'crimes' in, we...
rebel 2025-03-17 03:36 p.m.
You would be correct. Like I have said, I was focused on a real world issue, whilst also being ingame. This was not my priority then. How is this relevant, may I ask?
rebel 2025-03-17 03:37 p.m.
Are you questioning my reliability as a witness?
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:38 p.m.
So you agree that it is accurate that you were not entirely focused on the incident, and was not present throughout. Yet you previously stated that 'he (Defendant) spontaneously attacked Plaintiff without any good reason'?
huddy.So you agree that it is accurate that you were not entirely focused on the incident, and was not present throughout. Yet you previously stated that 'he (Defendant) spontaneously at...
rebel 2025-03-17 03:40 p.m.
Yes, your point? Like I have also said, I don't remember these minute details you keep picking on. However, I can, despite my semi-lack-of-presence, say that the defendant did spontaneously attack the plaintiff without any good reason. It's simply true. You can see it in the provided evidence, and out of the incident, I can remember there being a random murder at the Mersea Car Dealership. I was present enough to remember the main part of the event, the plaintiff's murder, but not these minute details you keep alluding to.
TL;DR, not present enough to remember the small details, present enough to remember witnessing a shocking murder.
TL;DR, not present enough to remember the small details, present enough to remember witnessing a shocking murder.
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:41 p.m.
So your statement that there was 'no good reason' is not based on what you saw, because you can't see a failure of reason if you just admitted you were not present the entire time and have no clue what happened beforehand, but is based on the evidence presented during discovery?
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:42 p.m.@rebel
rebel 2025-03-17 03:43 p.m.
I did say there was no good reason based on what I saw. Yes. Do you know of any valid reason for the defendant's acts?
rebel 2025-03-17 03:43 p.m.
If so, please do tell.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:43 p.m.
Otherwise I stand by my statement that there was no good reason.
rebel 2025-03-17 03:45 p.m.
I find it relevant to add there will be a gap in my response. I'm going AFK briefly.
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:45 p.m.
You just told us you were not present the whole time. Therefore you have no clue what occurred beforehand and cannot reasonably judge that there was no good reason. Your statement that there was 'no good reason' is based on the evidence submitted at discovery. You are not here as an expert witness to analyse evidence. You are here as an eye witness to tell us what you saw. @meowiitten Why are we admitting a witness who is simply commenting on what we can all see in the evidence footage?
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:45 p.m.@rebel Is it accurate to say that you are making false assumptions that you did not actually witness but are only stating now, based on evidence submitted during discovery?
huddy.You just told us you were not present the whole time. Therefore you have no clue what occurred beforehand and cannot reasonably judge that there was no good reason. Your statement ...
meowiitten 2025-03-17 03:48 p.m.
Because you can't just show a video to me
meowiitten 2025-03-17 03:48 p.m.
You need to lay foundation
meowiitten 2025-03-17 03:48 p.m.
And that's done through a witness
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:48 p.m.
This witness is listed by Plaintiff as an eye witness
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:49 p.m.
He is not recounting events that he saw, he is recounting events that we can see in the evidence submitted during discovery
huddy. 2025-03-17 03:49 p.m.
Plaintiff can make these points through opening and closing statements, not through an eye witness who didn't see this
huddy.You feared repercussions at the hands of criminals for reporting an alleged crime, which you recently referred to as a 'targeted assault with intention and malice', into your radio...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 03:57 p.m.
Objection, Irrelevant
huddy.You feared repercussions at the hands of an individual holding a crowbar, leading you not to report this action into your radio despite it being heinous according to you, though yo...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 03:58 p.m.
Objection, Irrelevant
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 03:58 p.m.
The Witness is not on trail here Your Honor
huddy.So you, holding a firearm , claim that you didn't report the action which you have just labelled as 'heinous and brutal', due to fear of repercussions at the hands of an **indiv...(edited)
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 03:59 p.m.
Objection, Irrelevant
huddy.Witness, is it accurate to say that this action committed by Defendant was not substantial in any way in your thoughts at the time, hence your decision not to report the action?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 03:59 p.m.
Objection, calls for speculation
huddy.Witness, is it accurate to say that you were not focused on the incident? I refer you to the fact that you failed to report it into the radio, despite calling other 'crimes' in, we...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:00 p.m.
Objection, the attorney is testifying
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:00 p.m.
Speculation? Read properly bud
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:01 p.m.@meowiitten
rebel 2025-03-17 04:02 p.m.
I'm just gonna wait before responding to further questioning.
huddy.Plaintiff can make these points through opening and closing statements, not through an eye witness who didn't see this
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:05 p.m.
He can't comment on evidence not presented during witness testimony
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:05 p.m.
Like he can't just say: "Oh it's in my discovery"
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:05 p.m.
If a witness didn't testify to it, then it cannot be used
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:05 p.m.
It's called laying a foundation
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:06 p.m.
That's out of fairness to you so you can cross-examine evidence
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:06 p.m.
Right
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:07 p.m.
No further questions Your Honor, witness’ outbursts and contradictory answers have sufficiently highlighted his unreliability.
Dark StrangerObjection, Irrelevant
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:08 p.m.
All down from here are sustained
huddy.No further questions Your Honor, witness’ outbursts and contradictory answers have sufficiently highlighted his unreliability.
rebel 2025-03-17 04:08 p.m.
damn...
rebeldamn...
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:08 p.m.
Don't speak to him
rebel 2025-03-17 04:09 p.m.
am i still required your honor?
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:09 p.m.
Final warning
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:09 p.m.@huddy. Are you finished with your examination?
huddy.No further questions Your Honor, witness’ outbursts and contradictory answers have sufficiently highlighted his unreliability.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:09 p.m.@meowiitten Your Honor, the witness is not unreliable.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:10 p.m.
The Defense just threw bunch of irrelevant questions at the witness
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:10 p.m.
Uh. Alright
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:10 p.m.@huddy. Do you have a witness to call?
sadoimpactohuddy. 2025-03-17 04:12 p.m.
Defense calls NexussOmega to the stand.
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-17 04:14 p.m. @meowiitten has added @corcaine to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:14 p.m.@corcaine Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:15 p.m.@meowiitten Can Defense call the witness from Plaintiff's list for direct questioning ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:16 p.m.
Since the defense did not submit a witness list themselves
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:16 p.m.
Generally I'd foreclose on a practice like that
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:16 p.m.
But the defense is allowed to present a defense by examining your case
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:17 p.m.
I still request you to uphold the integrity of court of law
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:17 p.m.
they should not have the right to directly question my witnesses
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:17 p.m.
How dare you
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:17 p.m.
Also if NexussOmega is on your witness list, he's free to call him
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:17 p.m.
if they wanted to then they should have submited a witness list
sadoimpactoAlso if NexussOmega is on your witness list, he's free to call him
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 04:18 p.m.
For Direct Questioning ??
Dark Strangerthey should not have the right to directly question my witnesses
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:21 p.m.
??
sadoimpactocorcaine 2025-03-17 04:31 p.m.
Yes, you honor.
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:41 p.m.@huddy.
meowiitten 2025-03-17 04:41 p.m.
DIRECT EXAMINATION OF NEXUSSOMEGA BY DEFENSEmeowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
huddy. 2025-03-17 04:50 p.m.@corcaine For what reason did you repeatedly touch and batter, without consent, Defendant?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:04 p.m.
I was not trying to touch the defendant, nor do I remember touching the defendant.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:04 p.m.
Do you remember repeatedly approaching Defendant despite Defendant running away from you?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:05 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:05 p.m.
For what reason was that?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:05 p.m.
I was trying to ask him why he hit me during the first assault
huddy.Do you remember repeatedly approaching Defendant despite Defendant running away from you?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:05 p.m.
Objection, leading
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:06 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:07 p.m.
It's a yes or no question
corcaineI was trying to ask him why he hit me during the first assault
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:07 p.m.
Is this referring to something seen on evidence or something alleged with no evidnece?(edited)
huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:07 p.m.
Start over
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:07 p.m.
Zero foundation to ask a single question
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:07 p.m.
Excuse me?
huddy.Is this referring to something seen on evidence or something alleged with no evidnece?(edited)
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:08 p.m.@meowiitten Your honor, I would request the court to strictly prohibit from editing messages since we (the attorneys) do not have access to logs
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:08 p.m.
Edited before witness answered.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:08 p.m.
I do not know that
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:09 p.m.@corcaine Let's start again. At the beginning of the sole video evidence exhibit, you can be seen chasing Defendant. Why is this?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:10 p.m.
I was trying to question the defendant why he hit me earlier.
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:10 p.m.
Defendant than ran off
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:11 p.m.
Are you aware of any evidence depicting defendant hitting you earlier, or is there a lack of evidence depicting this new allegation?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:13 p.m.
I did not have the clip because i did not expect him to hit me, which also lead me to not report him due to lack of evidence of the assault
corcaineI did not have the clip because i did not expect him to hit me, which also lead me to not report him due to lack of evidence of the assault
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:14 p.m.
When you chased him down, did you repeatedly run into him and touch him?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:15 p.m.
No
huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:20 p.m.
No
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:20 p.m.
I mean start over like
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:20 p.m.
"Please state your name for the record"
corcaineNo
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:20 p.m.Views. Watch Evidence and millions of other Roblox videos captured using Medal. 
Would you mind explaining to the court what the first 35 seconds of this video show?
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jM82yWPN2BIRxjidV?invite=cr-MSxCdDYsMzYwNjA3NzYs
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jM82yWPN2BIRxjidV?invite=cr-MSxCdDYsMzYwNjA3NzYs
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
"What is your relation to this case"
sadoimpactoI mean start over like
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
Oh right
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
"Your honor I'd like to present Exhibit X to the defendant"
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
"Can you describe what this exhibit is"
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
Alright didn't know we were going with allat formalitats
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
Want me to withdraw everything?
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
"Your honor I'd to admit exhibit X into evidence which has been recognized by the witness"
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:21 p.m.
Withdrawn
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:22 p.m.
Its hilarious that judge is teaching basic questioning to an attorney mid trial
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:22 p.m.
You couldn't even find a discovery template and had to lie about false child abuse in order to beg for an extension. Please refrain from your crude comments.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:22 p.m.@corcaine Please state your name for the record.
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:22 p.m.
NexussOmega
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:22 p.m.
What is your relation to this case?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:23 p.m.
I am the one who got assaulted and was killed, the plaintiff
huddy.You couldn't even find a discovery template and had to lie about false child abuse in order to beg for an extension. Please refrain from your crude comments.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:23 p.m.
What do you mean lie about ?? And once again I am asking you to STOP using words like "beg"
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:23 p.m.
The witness is mine. You are interrupting the courtroom.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:24 p.m.
Your Honor I'd like to present this exhibit to the Defendant.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:24 p.m.Views. Watch Evidence and millions of other Roblox videos captured using Medal.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:24 p.m.@corcaine Are you able to access and operate this exhibit of evidence submitted by yourself?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:24 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:25 p.m.
In the first 40 seconds of the video, did you or did you not repeatedly touch and assault Defendant?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:25 p.m.
Assault!!! Excuse me?
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:25 p.m.
It's a yes or no question.
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:25 p.m.
No I did not assault this man
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:26 p.m.
Between seconds 30 and 35 of the exhibit, please explain to the court what is going on.
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:28 p.m.
I was on the ladder of the billboard (not touching him) then i ask him why he hit me, He than looks away and I go up on the platform of the billboard and due to the minimal space for 2 people I brushed by him to look him in the face and to ask him again. He then hits me
corcaineI was on the ladder of the billboard (not touching him) then i ask him why he hit me, He than looks away and I go up on the platform of the billboard and due to the minimal space f...
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:28 p.m.
Did you or did you not sprint into him?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:28 p.m.
No.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:29 p.m.
Are you aware of what perjury is, Mr Omega?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:29 p.m.
I did not sprint in the clip where 30-35 seconds\
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:30 p.m.
Thank you for reassuring me.
huddy.Between seconds 30 and 35 of the exhibit, please explain to the court what is going on.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:31 p.m.@meowiitten Objection Your Honor, this isn't an expert witness so how can he comment on what is going on in the clip
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-17 05:32 p.m.
Overruled
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:32 p.m.
You don't need to be an expert to look at yourself and identify your actions.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:33 p.m.@meowiitten I wish to bring an cropped version of the exhibit into evidence that I have just cropped in order to take a closer look at the evidence.
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:34 p.m.@meowiitten Objection your honor, the defence needs to file such things in their discovery.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:35 p.m.
Your Honor I have just cropped this evidence in order to zoom in to illustrate my point.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:35 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:38 p.m.
May I continue?
huddy.Your Honor I have just cropped this evidence in order to zoom in to illustrate my point.
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:38 p.m.
That's fine as long as its the same video that he already submitted
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:38 p.m.
If it's different then its not ok
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:38 p.m.@corcaine This is a cropped version of the video that zooms in on your sprint key and the time. It can clearly be seen that in between 30 and 35 seconds, you did sprint and hold sprint into Defendant, despite you just assuring me under oath and under the pains of perjury that you did not sprint into Defendant.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:39 p.m.
cc: @meowiitten Witness has just perjured himself
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:39 p.m.
I cant see anything
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:39 p.m.
Look to the right side of the screen, where your sprint keybind can be seen contracting and relaxing.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:39 p.m.
Look to the left side of the screen, where the seconds can be seen.
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:42 p.m.
I fell so i might've pressed the shift button instinctively, But when we talk about sprinting aka running I did not. I went up a ladder.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:43 p.m.
Sir, if you look at the original video, you can clearly be seen sprinting ON THE PLATFORM into Defendant.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:43 p.m.
In fact, you only begun sprinting once you had got off the ladder and were on the platform.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:43 p.m.
CC: @meowiitten Witness continues to perjur himself.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:45 p.m.
Objection, your honor, my client can be seen going up a ladder during that time where his shift was toggled for a second. And the defendant struck him down as soon as he steped foot on the platform
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:45 p.m.
I do not see how he is perjuring
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 05:45 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:51 p.m.JamesMHamilton : Did you or did you not spring into him?
NexussOmega: No.
JamesMHamilton: Are you aware of what perjury is?
NexussOmega: I did not spring in the clip where 30-35 seconds/
The video clearly shows NexussOmega sprinting between 30-35 seconds.
NexussOmega: When we talk about sprinting, I did not.
The video clearly shows the sprint button being held.
NexussOmega: I went up a ladder [in response to sprinting allegation]
The wider, original video clearly shows NexussOmega only beginning to sprint at the top of the ladder when he got off and was on the platform, sprinting into my client.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:51 p.m.@meowiitten Witness has perjured himself three times, I request that you please review this.
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:51 p.m.
Enough
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:51 p.m.
There's no gotcha
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:51 p.m.
Just proceed with the questioning please
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:52 p.m.
I'd love to proceed with questioning and ignore the fact that Plaintiff repeatedly and explicitly informed me that he didn't sprint into Defendant, despite video evidence from his perspective clearly depicting it.
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:52 p.m.
The court is going to ignore this?
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:53 p.m.
No one's ignoring anything
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:53 p.m.@Dark Stranger Don't add anything
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:53 p.m.
Lying on oath three times is just a bit of fun then
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:53 p.m.
Alright then let's proceed
sadoimpactoNo one's ignoring anything
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:54 p.m.
Please expand upon this.
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:54 p.m.
You're allowed to impeach the witness
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:54 p.m.
But this isn't perjury
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:54 p.m.
Proceed
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:55 p.m.
Perjury is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:55 p.m.
I fail to see how lying three times is not perjury...
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:55 p.m.
Stop
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:55 p.m.
Proceed
meowiitten 2025-03-17 05:55 p.m.
Final warning
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:56 p.m.
Your Honor I will proceed and I am not intending to argue with you, however Defense does deserve an explanation...
huddy. 2025-03-17 05:57 p.m.@corcaine Could you tell me more about the events that took place prior to the beginning of the video?
corcaine 2025-03-17 05:59 p.m.
I was in the mersea parking lot and he drove up and came out of his car i then was gonna talk with him to make a friend but he instead hits me with a crowbar and runs away
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:00 p.m.
So at no point in time did you fire upon him with a firearm without legal justification, before being killed by a peace officer?
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:00 p.m.
I'll rephrase, withdrawn
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:00 p.m.
At any point in time, did you fire upon Defendant with a firearm without legal justification?
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:01 p.m.
No
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:01 p.m.
You are telling this court that in the ten minute period prior the beginning of your video clip, you did not fire upon Defendant with a firearm?
huddy.You are telling this court that in the ten minute period prior the beginning of your video clip, you did not fire upon Defendant with a firearm?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:02 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, Leading
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:02 p.m.
I am confirming his statement....
meowiitten 2025-03-17 06:02 p.m.
Overruled as to leading; sustained as to asked and answered
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:04 p.m.@corcaine I'm going to allow you one more opportunity to answer my question. I remind you that you are under oath, and implore you not to make the same mistake that you just made. Were you killed by a peace officer just before the beginning of your clip, due to your actions in attacking Defendant with a firearm?
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, asked and answered
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.
You really want to do this?
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.
I warn you that it won't end well.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.
I am trying to help your client to not lie multiple times on the stand again.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.
But ok, withdrawn - you asked for it.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.@corcaine Do you have any idea why Defendant hit you whilst on the billboard?
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:05 p.m.
No.
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:06 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, Calls for speculation
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:06 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:08 p.m.@corcaine Did you attempt to batter Defendant on the billboard ledge?
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:09 p.m.
No I attempted to go around to face him. There wasnt enough room so i brushed into him
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:12 p.m.@corcaine What do you consider to brush?
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:13 p.m.
Withdrawn.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:14 p.m.@corcaine Are you aware that sprinting is the fastest motion that one can physically take do in-game and does not constitute 'brushing' when somebody is sprinted into at point-blank range?
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:15 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, compound question
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:15 p.m.
Oh no what are we going to do
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:15 p.m.
WITHDRAWN. @corcaine Are you aware that sprinting is the fastest motion that one can physically take do in-game?
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Yes.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:19 p.m.@corcaine Are you aware of what constitutes brushing?
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:19 p.m.
Bumping inbto him trying to pass by him.
corcaine 2025-03-17 06:19 p.m.
into*
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:19 p.m.
Sad excuse
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:20 p.m.@corcaine Do you frequently take part in gun related crimes?
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:20 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, Irrelevant
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
It is not irrelevant at all. Defense's case exposes that Plaintiff killed Defendant prior to this incident.
huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
Stop
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
The only words we have had denouncing this are Defendant who claimed that he didn't do so, right after lying three times on the stand.
sadoimpactoStop
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
?
meowiitten 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
That’s not impeachment nor relevant
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:22 p.m.
I have just explained its relevance. Defense maintains that Plaintiff murdered Defendant with a firearm prior to this, as I have just questioned him on and he has repeatedly denied, right after having lied three times on the stand.
huddy.I have just explained its relevance. Defense maintains that Plaintiff murdered Defendant with a firearm prior to this, as I have just questioned him on and he has repeatedly denied...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:22 p.m.
The defense does not have any evidence or witness to support their outrageous claims your honor
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
and the plaintiff has denied the allegations
Dark Stranger 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.@meowiitten
huddy.I have just explained its relevance. Defense maintains that Plaintiff murdered Defendant with a firearm prior to this, as I have just questioned him on and he has repeatedly denied...
meowiitten 2025-03-17 06:25 p.m.
I told you not to bring that up with the “perjury” again
meowiitten 2025-03-17 06:25 p.m.
You’re not doing your client any good acting like this
Dark Strangerand the plaintiff has denied the allegations
huddy. 2025-03-18 03:45 a.m.
Plaintiff denies these allegations yet he previously denied other allegations and was caught lying.
huddy. 2025-03-18 03:46 a.m.
Defense plans to call Defendant to the stand later.
huddy. 2025-03-18 03:46 a.m.@meowiitten Please allow us to make our case
huddy. 2025-03-18 03:46 a.m.
We find ample relevance
huddy.Defense plans to call Defendant to the stand later.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 08:45 a.m.@meowiitten The Defendant was not even on the witness list
huddy.Plaintiff denies these allegations yet he previously denied other allegations and was caught lying.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 08:45 a.m.
Then what is the point of even questioning him ?
huddy. 2025-03-18 09:11 a.m.
Have you read anything I’ve said?
huddy. 2025-03-18 09:11 a.m.
Our defense is based on defendant’s testimony
huddy. 2025-03-18 09:11 a.m.
We allege that he was killed by Plaintiff prior to the edited clip starting
huddy. 2025-03-18 09:11 a.m.
The only thing we have to deny that right now are the words of somebody who already lied three times on the stand….
huddy.Our defense is based on defendant’s testimony
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 09:13 a.m.
You should have provided a witness list then
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 09:14 a.m.
you can not just bring in a witness mid trial
huddy.We allege that he was killed by Plaintiff prior to the edited clip starting
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 09:14 a.m.
of which you have no evidence
huddy.The only thing we have to deny that right now are the words of somebody who already lied three times on the stand….
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 09:15 a.m.
that is what you say, the defendant did not lie bcs he said he did not SPRINT, SPRINT refers to an act of running. He was climbing ladder, not running.
huddy. 2025-03-18 10:01 a.m.
Bud do you know that holding a sprint button whilst on a platform standing up consitutes sprintung
huddy.Bud do you know that holding a sprint button whilst on a platform standing up consitutes sprintung
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 10:04 a.m.
you did not specify that you were talking about holding the sprint button
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 10:04 a.m.
you just said sprint
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 10:04 a.m.
which means the act of running
huddy. 2025-03-18 10:53 a.m.
Sir you’re pathetic attempts to justify this are feeble to say the least
huddy. 2025-03-18 10:53 a.m.
Just stop lmao
huddy.Defense plans to call Defendant to the stand later.
meowiitten 2025-03-18 12:27 p.m.
Alright
huddy. 2025-03-18 12:35 p.m.
Thank you Your Honor.
huddy. 2025-03-18 12:35 p.m.@corcaine You maintain that you did not assault Defendant with a firearm prior to the incident. Did you assault anybody with a firearm?
sadoimpactoAlright
Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 12:37 p.m.
Your honor, the defendant is not on the witness list, how can they testify ??
meowiitten 2025-03-18 12:39 p.m.
Because he’s the defendant
huddy.corcaine 2025-03-18 12:42 p.m.
No.
huddy. 2025-03-18 01:36 p.m.@corcaine Have you assaulted anybody with a firearm around the time of the incident?
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-18 01:37 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, asked and answered
huddy. 2025-03-18 02:10 p.m.
I asked him if he assaulted anyone prior to the incident. Now I am asking if he did at any reasonable point in time surrounding the incident
huddy. 2025-03-18 02:10 p.m.
includes after
huddy.corcaine 2025-03-18 03:44 p.m.
No
corcaineNo
huddy. 2025-03-18 04:04 p.m.
Have you ever assaulted anybody with a firearm?
huddy.Have you ever assaulted anybody with a firearm?
meowiitten 2025-03-18 04:19 p.m.
Stricken
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-18 04:19 p.m.
Sustained
huddy. 2025-03-18 04:31 p.m.@corcaine You claim not to have assaulted Defendant with a firearm prior to the incident. Did you have any altercation with him whatsoever? 1
1huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-18 06:19 p.m.
How many times will you ask the same question with different words?
meowiitten 2025-03-18 06:19 p.m.
That was a passive question by the way
huddy. 2025-03-19 03:38 a.m.
I am simply inquiring as to if he believes anything whatsoever ocurred.
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 04:41 a.m.@meowiitten Objection your honor, asked and asnwered. The Plaintiff already made it clear that during his previous encounter with defendant in the game, the defendant just appeared out of the blue and hit the plaintiff with a crowbar and ran away.
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-19 12:19 p.m.
Sustained
huddy. 2025-03-19 02:22 p.m.
No further questions.
meowiitten 2025-03-19 04:33 p.m.
CROSS EXAMINATION OF NEXUSSOMEGA BY PLAINTIFF
meowiitten 2025-03-19 04:33 p.m.@Dark Stranger
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 04:40 p.m.@corcaine Can you explain what happened when you saw the Defendant, B3NXXXX, on the sidewalk?
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:38 p.m.
When I saw him I remembered he was the guy who hit me prior, so I thought to myself let me ask him why he did it. So I decided to go upto him, when he saw me he started to walk away, I followed him because I wanted to talk to him about it but instead he just kept going.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 05:41 p.m.@corcaine Can you describe what happened when you reached the top of the billboard and approached the Defendant?
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:43 p.m.
When i reached the top the defendant was standing right by the edge so I was not able to easily get onto the platform of the billboard. When I eventually got to thew top I tried going around him but due to the small space I accidently bumped into him while trying to face him. But before I could say anything he decided to hit me again which eventually made me fall from the billboard.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 05:44 p.m.@corcaine How did the Defendant's actions make you feel at that moment?
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:45 p.m.
I was very mad and confused.
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:47 p.m.
I was extremely sad and when I got up from the floor I was stumbling around due to the fall
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 05:47 p.m.@corcaine After the initial attack on the billboard, what did you do next?
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:48 p.m.
I ran away because I was scared for my life that he would follow me and kill me.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 05:49 p.m.@corcaine You mentioned that the Defendant hit you one last time before you died. Could you explain the circumstances surrounding that final attack?
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:51 p.m.
I was walking around eating my popcorn when I saw the defendant again at night and when I went upto him he hits me immediatly multiple times.
corcaine 2025-03-19 05:57 p.m.
I think he actually jumped me, it's been about a month since it happened and I don't reemember exactly what happened.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-19 05:58 p.m.
No Further Questions Your Honor
@meowiitten
Dark Stranger 2025-03-20 02:12 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-20 02:13 p.m.@Dark Stranger Next witness?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-20 02:13 p.m.
No Your Honor
meowiitten 2025-03-20 02:13 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-20 02:24 p.m.
Defence calls @Obama to the stand.
meowiitten 2025-03-20 02:47 p.m.
DIRECT EXAMINATION OF B3NXXXX BY DEFENSEmeowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-20 02:47 p.m. @meowiitten has added @Obama to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-03-20 02:48 p.m.@Obama Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
sadoimpactoObama 2025-03-20 02:49 p.m.
yes i do
meowiitten 2025-03-20 02:49 p.m.@huddy. Proceed
huddy. 2025-03-20 03:02 p.m.@Obama Please state your name for the record
Obama 2025-03-20 03:03 p.m.
B3NXXXX
huddy. 2025-03-20 03:45 p.m.@Obama What is your relation to this case?
Obama 2025-03-20 03:46 p.m.
I am the Defendant, accused of three counts by Plaintiff.
huddy. 2025-03-20 03:50 p.m.@Obama You are accused of attacking Plaintiff on the ledge of the billboard in the Mersea Car Dealership, Mersea. Did you commit this action?
Obama 2025-03-20 03:52 p.m.
The video evidence identifies me as defending myself.
ObamaThe video evidence identifies me as defending myself.
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:02 p.m.
Please expand upon this
Obama 2025-03-20 04:04 p.m.
I saw the Defendant, who had killed me just before, and he began chasing me so I ran up onto the billboard. Then he came up from behind me and ran into me, so I turned around and hit him for him to stop. I also thought he may be armed, like he was before
ObamaI saw the Defendant, who had killed me just before, and he began chasing me so I ran up onto the billboard. Then he came up from behind me and ran into me, so I turned around and h...
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:05 p.m.
Did you consent to Defendant running into you and touching you?
Obama 2025-03-20 04:07 p.m.
No sir
ObamaNo sir
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:07 p.m.
Were you aware that he was unarmed?
Obama 2025-03-20 04:08 p.m.
No sir, he came from behind and violently ran into me and had previously shot me so I had no idea sir
ObamaNo sir, he came from behind and violently ran into me and had previously shot me so I had no idea sir
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:09 p.m.
You keep mentioning that he previously shot you - please tell me more about this...
Obama 2025-03-20 04:11 p.m.
So essentially I was just hanging out in Mersea when NexussOmega appeared out of nowhere and began shooting at me and the other police officer for no reason when we were just standing there. I died becuz he shot me for no reason and I respawned but the police officer killed NexussOmega. When I came back, I saw him again, and that is why I ran away because I didn't want him to attack me again for no reason. I literally lost money the first time from my wallet…
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:13 p.m.@Obama So we've established why you made the first defensive response. Later, at the car dealership, why did you attack him again?
Obama 2025-03-20 04:17 p.m.
As I said, he killed me before for no reason whatsoever and it was completely unfair because I lost money, so in the heat of the moment I attacked him. I didn't mean for him to die because I don't fight fire with fire, but he deserved something for killing me and trying to kill the police officer for no reason whatsoever and making me lose money
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 12:51 p.m.@meowiitten @huddy. Is the Defense done with Direct Examination ?
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:14 p.m.@Obama Do you regret defending yourself after being unfairly killed as you claim?
Obama 2025-03-21 03:16 p.m.
Absolutely not. I was fully in my rights and it was the heat of the moment with passion that I committed the action after being shot and killed for no reason by the Plaintiff.
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:17 p.m.
No further questions your honor.
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:33 p.m.
CROSS EXAM OF B3NXXXX BY PLAINTIFF
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:33 p.m.@Dark Stranger
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:37 p.m.@Obama You testified that the Plaintiff, NexussOmega, killed you prior to the incident at the billboard, correct?
Obama 2025-03-21 03:38 p.m.
Yes, he did indeed, for no justifiable reason.
Obama 2025-03-21 03:38 p.m.
The 'incident' was a response to that.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:39 p.m.@Obama And you claim that you were shot and killed by the Plaintiff without provocation, is that right?
Obama 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Indeed. Why are you asking me things that we have already established?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.@Obama And you claim that you were shot and killed by the Plaintiff without provocation, is that right?
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Objection
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Asked and answered
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Withdrawen
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Withdrawn
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:40 p.m.
Bro is copy and pasting from his chatgpt document lmfao
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:41 p.m.@Obama You have no video evidence of this alleged attack, do you?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:43 p.m.
This a simple yes or no question
Obama 2025-03-21 03:43 p.m.
I did not record the attack because my medal is very dodgy and it just lags me out of Clark and any other game I play. Plaintiff would have the recording but he purposefully cut his video short to not include him killing me and trying to kill the other guy, but to only include my response to that. It's an atrocious attempt to incriminate me and hide his own actions...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:43 p.m.
Do not speculate
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:43 p.m.
Just answer what is being asked
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:44 p.m.@Obama So, you have no concrete proof to support your claim that the Plaintiff shot and killed you before the incident at the billboard, correct?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:44 p.m.
Yes or No
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:45 p.m.
Objection
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:45 p.m.
Asked and answered
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:45 p.m.
I asked about evidence in my previous question, this is any proof
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:45 p.m.
specifically video evidence was asked in previous question
Obama 2025-03-21 03:46 p.m.
I could get the officer to testify too though because he saw it and killed Plaintiff...
UserMessage could not be loaded.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.@meowiitten Why the witness saying such things ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
defendant*
Dark Strangerhuddy. 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
?
UserMessage could not be loaded.
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
Stricken(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
Why is he responding to your question?
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
How absurd of him
huddy.Why is he responding to your question?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
Was that my question
sadoimpactoStricken(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
How so?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:47 p.m.
It was yes or no question
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:48 p.m.
Why was it deleted
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:48 p.m.@meowiitten You ordered no more mentions of perjury
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:48 p.m.
Witness has not claimed perjury
huddy.Why was it deleted
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
Because it was stricken from the record
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
Witness has merely pointed out a fact, that Plaintiff said three things under oath that were proven wrong
huddy.Witness has merely pointed out a fact, that Plaintiff said three things under oath that were proven wrong
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
Again, it were not
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
So why was this stricken?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
you are not the one to decide that
huddy.Witness has merely pointed out a fact, that Plaintiff said three things under oath that were proven wrong
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
I warned you not to go there again
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
Ok right so how awful of me to say that the witness has lied when he says that he didn't sprint and a video shows him sprinting
sadoimpactoI warned you not to go there again
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
yeah, hence why we didn't claim perjury
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
I thought that's what you didn't want us to do
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.
You never made it clear that you wanted no mention of the incident whatsoever
Dark StrangerI asked about evidence in my previous question, this is any proof
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:49 p.m.@Obama Answer the question
Obama 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
As I said, I didn't film. The only proof you would have is my word under oath, which I have provided, and the word of the officer, which we can provide if allowed.
sadoimpactohuddy. 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
Your Honor, I really do ask you to explain to me why we cannot even bring up the fact that the Plaintiff lied? I get why you don't want me to continue to allege perjury, hence why we stopped after you told me to, but you never told me you don't want Plaintiff's actions mentioned at all
huddy. 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
And we have no reason provided
huddy.Your Honor, I really do ask you to explain to me why we cannot even bring up the fact that the Plaintiff lied? I get why you don't want me to continue to allege perjury, hence why ...
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
I'm not speaking to you
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
Why are you interrupting me?
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:52 p.m.
I was speaking to the witness
ObamaAs I said, I didn't film. The only proof you would have is my word under oath, which I have provided, and the word of the officer, which we can provide if allowed.
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:54 p.m.
So there's no video evidence of the incident beforehand where you allege that the Plaintiff assaulted you?
meowiitten 2025-03-21 03:57 p.m.@Obama Please answer the question. Let the record reflect that I am now questioning the witness pursuant to this court’s inherent authority as the fact-finder in this bench trial. So both parties are free to object to my questions.
sadoimpactoSo there's no video evidence of the incident beforehand where you allege that the Plaintiff assaulted you?
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:06 p.m.@Obama
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:06 p.m.
This is not a question that you ignore
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:08 p.m.
I'd like to add that even if there were evidence of a prior altercation — and I understand there is none from what I'm seeing — that would not, on its own, provide a legal defense to a subsequent act of wrongful death, assault, and battery.
Obama 2025-03-21 04:17 p.m.
Correct, like I’ve just informed the court. I am not ignoring anything, I apologise for my heinous acts in consuming dinner with my family.
Obama 2025-03-21 04:18 p.m.@meowiitten
ObamaCorrect, like I’ve just informed the court. I am not ignoring anything, I apologise for my heinous acts in consuming dinner with my family.
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:24 p.m.
What is the name of the officer that can testify to this?
I could get the officer to testify too though because he saw it and killed Plaintiff...
What is the name of the officer that can testify to this?
sadoimpactoI could get the officer to testify too though because he saw it and killed Plaintiff... What is the name of the officer that can testify to this?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 04:30 p.m.@meowiitten Your Honor, I do not believe that the officer can testify as they are not on witnesses list
Dark Stranger 2025-03-21 04:30 p.m.
and this is very mid trial
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-21 04:33 p.m.
He’s going to answer my question
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:33 p.m.
Do not talk over me unless you have an objection
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:34 p.m.
Also, the court can call its own witness whenever it wants
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:34 p.m.
I don’t need you two to call them for me
huddy. 2025-03-21 04:48 p.m.@meowiitten My client is in a late timezone so probably won't respond, he is not evading or ignoring your question in any way but I presume he's gone to sleep bc he usually does at this time
huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:50 p.m.
He ate dinner and then immediately went to sleep?
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:50 p.m.
Okay well he’s going to answer my questions
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:50 p.m.
He’s not getting out of it
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:50 p.m.
I literally do not care how long it takes
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:51 p.m.
And if he doesn’t answer then he’ll be treated the same way that any other uncooperative witness will be
meowiitten 2025-03-21 04:52 p.m.@Obama
What is the name of the officer that can testify to this?
“I could get the officer to testify too though because he saw it and killed Plaintiff…”
What is the name of the officer that can testify to this?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-22 04:25 p.m.@meowiitten Its been 24 hours since the question was asked and the witness did not respond your honor
sadoimpactomeowiitten 2025-03-22 04:26 p.m.@Obama Are you going to answer the question?
meowiitten 2025-03-22 04:30 p.m.@huddy.
meowiitten 2025-03-22 04:51 p.m.
Okay, I see how it is
Dark Stranger 2025-03-22 05:02 p.m.@meowiitten Am I allowed to ask the court's next course of action your honor ?
sadoimpactohuddy. 2025-03-22 05:28 p.m.
why are you pinging me
huddy. 2025-03-22 06:18 p.m.
I'm out rn but I'll dm him tomorrow to respond
meowiitten 2025-03-22 06:30 p.m.ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
@huddy. @Dark Stranger @Obama
236.46 KB
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-03-22 06:30 p.m.@Obama You need to pay a $250 fine
meowiitten 2025-03-22 06:31 p.m.
Let me know when you can get online
huddy. 2025-03-23 05:08 a.m.@meowiitten ??
huddy. 2025-03-23 05:08 a.m.
is this a joke
Obama 2025-03-23 08:02 a.m.
How can you hold me in contempt for not answering you when I wasn't on discord or roblox?? I wasn't choosing to ignore you but just because I don't check this roblox court case once, doesn't mean you should be going on a power trip and giving me a record...??
The officer's name was V3FES...
The officer's name was V3FES...
meowiitten 2025-03-23 11:19 a.m.@V3FES
ObamaHow can you hold me in contempt for not answering you when I wasn't on discord or roblox?? I wasn't choosing to ignore you but just because I don't check this roblox court case onc...
meowiitten 2025-03-23 11:19 a.m.
Okay, you owe me $250 by Friday at 5:00 PM EDT
Dark Strangeryou are not the one to decide that
meowiitten 2025-03-23 11:20 a.m.
Do you have any further questions of the defendant before I call the officer?(edited)
sadoimpactoDo you have any further questions of the defendant before I call the officer?(edited)
Dark Stranger 2025-03-23 11:32 a.m.
Yes Your Honor
meowiitten 2025-03-23 11:33 a.m.
Okay go ahead
Dark StrangerYes Your Honor
meowiitten 2025-03-24 04:52 p.m.
Okay go ahead
meowiitten 2025-03-24 04:52 p.m.
You have until 11:59 PM EDT tonight to ask your last question
Dark Stranger 2025-03-24 05:34 p.m.@Obama When you struck the Plaintiff at the car dealership, was he physically attacking you at that time?
sadoimpactoYou have until 11:59 PM EDT tonight to ask your last question
Dark Stranger 2025-03-24 05:34 p.m.
What if he does not respond in time ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-24 05:34 p.m.
Bcs we have often seen he does not
Obama 2025-03-25 12:40 p.m.
Not at the immediate time, no...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 12:46 p.m.@Obama So, even though there was no actual threat from the Plaintiff, you chose to escalate the situation by striking him, resulting in his death, correct?
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:04 p.m.@Dark Stranger That was your last question
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:04 p.m.
I’ll count his response
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:05 p.m.@Obama Reminder that you owe the court $250 by Friday
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:05 p.m.
Let me know when you can get in game
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:05 p.m.
Alright
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-25 01:05 p.m. @meowiitten has added @V3FES to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:06 p.m.
The court calls @V3FES for direct examination. Both parties may object to a line of the court’s questioning at any time and I will rule on said objection. After this examination is over, either party may cross-examine the witness—but they do not have to.
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:07 p.m.@V3FES Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:08 p.m.
I do
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:09 p.m.@V3FES Could you please state your name for the record?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:09 p.m.
V3FES
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:10 p.m.@V3FES Where are you employed?
Obama 2025-03-25 01:12 p.m.
Your honor can i still awnser?
ObamaYour honor can i still awnser?
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:13 p.m.
It was a duplicate question so there’s no need
sadoimpactomeowiitten 2025-03-25 01:13 p.m.@V3FES
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:15 p.m.
I am a Sergeant for the Lander City Police Department
V3FESI am a Sergeant for the Lander City Police Department
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:15 p.m.
How long have you been with the Lander City Police Department?
sadoimpactoHow long have you been with the Lander City Police Department?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:16 p.m.
I have been with the LCPD for around 5 months I believe
V3FESI have been with the LCPD for around 5 months I believe
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:17 p.m.
Are you familiar with the facts of this case?
sadoimpactoAre you familiar with the facts of this case?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:18 p.m.
Indeed I am.
V3FESIndeed I am.
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:19 p.m.
How are you connected to this case?
sadoimpactoHow are you connected to this case?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:23 p.m.
I have been called here by the court as the Defendant has told the court that I previously killed the Plaintiff.
V3FESI have been called here by the court as the Defendant has told the court that I previously killed the Plaintiff.
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:29 p.m.
Just to clarify, are you saying that you personally killed the Plaintiff (NexussOmega)?
sadoimpactoJust to clarify, are you saying that you personally killed the Plaintiff (NexussOmega)?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 01:32 p.m.@meowiitten Objection, Leading
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-25 01:34 p.m.
He has already stated what he believes that he is here for, so he has already semi-given the answer for which I want clarification on to understand his involvement in this case; overruled.
sadoimpactoHe has already stated what he believes that he is here for, so he has already semi-given the answer for which I want clarification on to understand his involvement in this case; ...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 01:34 p.m.
even so, the phrasing of the question is leading
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:34 p.m.
Once I rule on an objection, you don't challenge it
sadoimpactoJust to clarify, are you saying that you personally killed the Plaintiff (NexussOmega)?
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:35 p.m.@V3FES
sadoimpactoJust to clarify, are you saying that you personally killed the Plaintiff (NexussOmega)?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:35 p.m.
Absolutely. Prior to the incident being evaluated in this trial, the Plaintiff rocked up to the dealership and began firing shots at us, killing the Defendant, so I pulled out my service firearm and responded fire, killing the Plaintiff.
V3FESAbsolutely. Prior to the incident being evaluated in this trial, the Plaintiff rocked up to the dealership and began firing shots at us, killing the Defendant, so I pulled out my s...
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:41 p.m.
Do you record your patrols or any interactions you have while on duty?
sadoimpactoDo you record your patrols or any interactions you have while on duty?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:44 p.m.
I only record arrests in case they are contested, or if I kill someone for something that might be contested, e.g running somebody over with a car - if somebody shoots at me and I am clearly defending my life and the safety of civilians around me, I don't record my returning fire as there is no question of the legal justification in returning fire, so I don't press F2 and clog up my medal space.
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:46 p.m.
Alright.
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:46 p.m.@huddy. @Dark Stranger Does anyone wants cross?
huddy. 2025-03-25 01:47 p.m.
I would
meowiitten 2025-03-25 01:47 p.m.@huddy. Ok go
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-25 01:49 p.m.
I would also like to after defense
huddy. 2025-03-25 01:49 p.m.@V3FES Did you witness the Defendant taking part in any actions that may have provoked the Plaintiff into shooting him?
V3FES 2025-03-25 01:50 p.m.
No, they had no prior interaction whatsoever under my watch.
V3FESNo, they had no prior interaction whatsoever under my watch.
huddy. 2025-03-25 01:57 p.m.@V3FES Was Plaintiff a threat capable of causing deadly harm to you and Defendant?
huddy.V3FES 2025-03-25 01:59 p.m.
Absolutely so.
huddy. 2025-03-25 02:00 p.m.
No further questions @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-25 02:01 p.m.@Dark Stranger
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 03:23 p.m.@V3FES Officer V3FES, you mentioned you’re employed by the Lander City Police Department, correct?
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-25 03:25 p.m.
You don’t need to ask that question again
meowiitten 2025-03-25 03:25 p.m.
It’s already in the scope of direct examination
meowiitten 2025-03-25 03:25 p.m.
So therefore in the scope of cross
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 03:29 p.m.@V3FES You were operating outside of your jurisdiction when this incident occurred, correct?
Dark StrangerV3FES 2025-03-25 03:55 p.m.
Yeah, LCPD's jurisdiction is Lander, but can still operate in full duties when called out to other areas of the county. I was in Mersea at the time because I had been called there due to high levels of crime in an LCPD Req, and was planning on heading back before I was shot at by Plaintiff.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 03:56 p.m.@V3FES You were not directly involved in the events that led up to the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against the Defendant, correct?
Dark StrangerV3FES 2025-03-25 04:22 p.m.
The events that led up to the Plaintiff's lawsuit against Defendant were you writing a civil suit document. What sort of question is that??
huddy. 2025-03-25 04:22 p.m.
Objection @meowiitten
huddy. 2025-03-25 04:23 p.m.
Vague, irrelevant and confusing question.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:23 p.m.
It is clear and totally relevant, I am asking if he was involved in the events for this lawsuit
huddy. 2025-03-25 04:24 p.m.
Well obviously he wasn't involved in you writing a document and filing it using a bot
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:25 p.m.
Well it clearly means the in game events
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:25 p.m.
Not the Process of the Lawsuit being filed
huddy. 2025-03-25 04:25 p.m.
1. How is he supposed to know that?
2. 'The events' is a huge space of time
2. 'The events' is a huge space of time
huddy. 2025-03-25 04:25 p.m.
Be more concise
huddy.Objection @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-25 04:36 p.m.
Overruled
V3FESThe events that led up to the Plaintiff's lawsuit against Defendant were you writing a civil suit document. What sort of question is that??
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:38 p.m.
The question is asking you about the in game "events" and not the legal process.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:38 p.m.
Please answer accordingly
V3FES 2025-03-25 04:42 p.m.
No, the video does not show me at the scene when the clip is taken..???
V3FESNo, the video does not show me at the scene when the clip is taken..???
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:58 p.m.
Please do not answer based on the evidence until otherwaise stated. Please answer according to what you remember.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 04:59 p.m.
otherwise*
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:00 p.m.
No, once again, I was not present. I haven’t been called here as a witness to testify about the incident detailed in the suit, I have been called by the court to discuss matters that took place prior to the incident.
V3FESYeah, LCPD's jurisdiction is Lander, but can still operate in full duties when called out to other areas of the county. I was in Mersea at the time because I had been called there ...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:10 p.m.
As you mentioned that you were called over there due to high levels of crime, is it possible that someone harmed the plaintiff in response to which plaintiff started shooting in self defence ??
Dark StrangerAs you mentioned that you were called over there due to high levels of crime, is it possible that someone harmed the plaintiff in response to which plaintiff started shooting in se...
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:20 p.m.
No. The high level of crime was a series of robberies, not reports of shootings. I did not see or hear a report of anyone shooting Plaintiff. The defendant was by my side for a long time. The Plaintiff shot at me and Defendant and there was no one else around us who could have had a feud with the Plaintiff.
V3FESNo. The high level of crime was a series of robberies, not reports of shootings. I did not see or hear a report of anyone shooting Plaintiff. The defendant was by my side for a lon...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:23 p.m.
Is it possible that there would be someone not in your line of sight ?
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:26 p.m.
You have just asked me if the Plaintiff shot me because there was perhaps somebody near me that he was aiming for that had attacked him earlier. I am telling you that there was no one near us and it was literally just the Defendant and I - the Plaintiff couldn’t have ‘accidentally’ hit us whilst aiming for somebody else.
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:26 p.m.
And even so, it doesn’t matter - he killed Defendant and injured me.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:26 p.m.
It was a simple yes or no question
V3FESAnd even so, it doesn’t matter - he killed Defendant and injured me.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:27 p.m.
Please answer only to the extend of whats being asked
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:28 p.m.
Your question is completely random and does not make sense. ‘Was there anybody not in your line of sight?’ - what is this referring to and what is the relevance?
V3FESYour question is completely random and does not make sense. ‘Was there anybody not in your line of sight?’ - what is this referring to and what is the relevance?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:29 p.m.
My question was "Is it possible..." and it is was referring to your previous answer.
V3FES 2025-03-25 05:30 p.m.
I'm going to bed because it's getting late, I will answer tomorrow
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:35 p.m.
Please don't crash out and hold my client in contempt for going to sleep
V3FESNo, once again, I was not present. I haven’t been called here as a witness to testify about the incident detailed in the suit, I have been called by the court to discuss matters th...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:37 p.m.
Officer, you’ve testified that you were not present during the actual incident for which the Defendant is being sued. So, the events that you are describing—the ones leading up to the altercation—could have taken place after the incident for which the Defendant is being sued, is that correct?
huddy.Please don't crash out and hold my client in contempt for going to sleep
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:37 p.m.
Is V3FES your client?
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:39 p.m.
Please don't crash out and hold like my client in contempt for going to sleep*
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:39 p.m.@V3FES when do you wake up sir
sadoimpactoIs V3FES your client?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.v3fes-v-dimadima4321 I'd say yes
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.@meowiitten Do I have permission to DM the witness to ask him something related to his answering (timing of when he will be on) so i can do objections
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.@huddy. You didn't tell me that V3FES is your client
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.
V3FES isn't my client wdym
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.
I represented his business once in a defunct case
huddy.Please don't crash out and hold like my client in contempt for going to sleep*
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:40 p.m.
I meant to say like my client not my client bruh
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:41 p.m.
Remember that my actual client was held in contempt because he went to sleep and couldn't answer
huddy.I represented his business once in a defunct case
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:41 p.m.
You're supposed to tell me that. This is a key third-party witness to the integrity of both of your cases and is an impeachment witness.(edited)
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:41 p.m.
I'm supposed to tell you if I have a relationship or a conflict of interest
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:42 p.m.
I represented his business, which was handled by somebody else im pretty sure that I dealt with, last year
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:43 p.m.
and I remind you that this just happens to be who was with my client, I have no clue as to what happened there, I was just given a name in the same channel as you sir
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:44 p.m.
I have 102 clients
huddy.I'm supposed to tell you if I have a relationship or a conflict of interest
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:51 p.m.
You have a relationship
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:51 p.m.
Even if it's in the past
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:51 p.m.
I will rule on whether it's a conflict of interest
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:51 p.m.
But you have to tell me
meowiitten 2025-03-25 05:51 p.m.
Me finding this out based on implied statements is not what I want
huddy. 2025-03-25 06:20 p.m.
I mean the guy isn’t even my client anymore, he’s just one of numerous people that I’ve advised or represented
huddy. 2025-03-25 06:20 p.m.
I have no close or working relationship, hence why I have not said anything because I literally forgot who he was
meowiitten 2025-03-25 06:20 p.m.
I highly doubt you forgot who he was
meowiitten 2025-03-25 06:21 p.m.
And regardless
meowiitten 2025-03-25 06:21 p.m.
You are supposed to remember for me
meowiitten 2025-03-25 06:21 p.m.
Not for you
huddy.meowiitten 2025-03-25 06:21 p.m.
No
sadoimpactoI highly doubt you forgot who he was
huddy. 2025-03-26 03:42 a.m.
Sir I have had literally over a hundred clients since his case, and in his case I literally wrote like one document and spent half an hour on it
huddy. 2025-03-26 03:42 a.m.
But apologies for not informing you
V3FES 2025-03-26 07:23 a.m.
No, they took place before because I was told after when the suit incident happened.
V3FES 2025-03-26 07:23 a.m.@Dark Stranger
V3FESNo, they took place before because I was told after when the suit incident happened.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 07:23 a.m.
Can you elaborate on this ?
Dark StrangerCan you elaborate on this ?
V3FES 2025-03-26 01:16 p.m.
What is there to elaborate? You just asked me if there is any chance that the incident between Defendant and Plaintiff took place before the Plaintiff shot Defendant. I just told you that there isn’t such a chance, I am perfectly confident and sure that it happened after.
V3FESWhat is there to elaborate? You just asked me if there is any chance that the incident between Defendant and Plaintiff took place before the Plaintiff shot Defendant. I just told y...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 01:17 p.m.
I am asking you to elaborate on how are you so confident given you were not even present at the time of the incident
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 01:17 p.m.
As I am unable to understand clearly from your response above
V3FES 2025-03-26 01:24 p.m.
When I was called here and reviewed the evidence, the incident being sued for took place at 14:34. I don't play after half past on a Wednesday because I go out to attend IRL commitments, and I remember being shot by and killing the Plaintiff whilst I was online, which must have been before half past as I turn off my computer at half past to drive to irl stuff. So the shooting must have happened before the Defendant responded by attacking the Plaintiff later. That is not me arguing against you, it's just genuine logic on my behalf which confirms that..
V3FESWhen I was called here and reviewed the evidence, the incident being sued for took place at 14:34. I don't play after half past on a Wednesday because I go out to attend IRL commit...
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 01:30 p.m.
You do realise that the time shown in clip is the local time of player and not time in EST ?
Dark StrangerYou do realise that the time shown in clip is the local time of player and not time in EST ?
huddy. 2025-03-26 02:30 p.m.
What is the relevance of this question? Please get to the point
huddy. 2025-03-26 02:30 p.m.
I’dike that noted as an objection - you keep asking these random questions
Dark StrangerYou do realise that the time shown in clip is the local time of player and not time in EST ?
V3FES 2025-03-26 02:32 p.m.
I do…? I'm not stupid
V3FESI do…? I'm not stupid
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 02:43 p.m.
So how can you be sure that it happened after the shooting you say you witness as the time is not in your local timezone?
huddy.What is the relevance of this question? Please get to the point
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 02:45 p.m.
The point is knowing that when the event V3FES claims he saw happened
huddy. 2025-03-26 02:45 p.m.
can you formulate a proper sentence please?
V3FES 2025-03-26 02:47 p.m.
What timezone is the Plaintiff in? I’m clearly in the same one as I remember going offline at 14:30 on that Wednesday, as I always do.
V3FESWhat timezone is the Plaintiff in? I’m clearly in the same one as I remember going offline at 14:30 on that Wednesday, as I always do.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 02:49 p.m.
The Plaintiff does not wish to disclose this country of residence or his timezone. Just answer the question based on the facts given.
V3FES 2025-03-26 02:54 p.m.
I am confident that I remember that the shooting took place prior to 14:30, and the evidence shows the incident taking place after 14:30.
V3FESI am confident that I remember that the shooting took place prior to 14:30, and the evidence shows the incident taking place after 14:30.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 02:55 p.m.
Again, the time in evidence is in Plaintiff's local time and not in EST
Dark StrangerAgain, the time in evidence is in Plaintiff's local time and not in EST
V3FES 2025-03-26 02:55 p.m.
Is there a question here?
V3FESIs there a question here?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 02:56 p.m.
The question is still same, is it possible that the events you claim to witness could have taken place after the events for which the defendant is being sued ?
V3FES 2025-03-26 03:09 p.m.
No.
huddy. 2025-03-26 03:10 p.m.
Objection, asked and answered
huddy. 2025-03-26 03:16 p.m.
Also I'm p sure if the witness says he's EST, then he's in the same timezone as your client
huddy.Also I'm p sure if the witness says he's EST, then he's in the same timezone as your client
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 04:06 p.m.
why would you say so ?
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:06 p.m.
Stay on topic
huddy.Objection, asked and answered
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:07 p.m.
Overruled
sadoimpactoStay on topic
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 04:08 p.m.
Your honor, the witness stated that there no possibility that event he witnessed might have occured after what my client has sued defendant for, even though it was established that he was not present that the time when the events of the case defendant is being sued occurred.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 04:08 p.m.
What shall we consider this ?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 04:10 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:11 p.m.
Why are you asking me?
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:11 p.m.
What
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:12 p.m.
You're only dealing with witnesses right now
meowiitten 2025-03-26 04:12 p.m.
Are you done examining?
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:00 p.m.@meowiitten I know I'm not meant to speak, but Defendant is trying to ruin the witness' credibility by claiming that because he was not present, the shooting could have occurred after the incident. The witness has stated that the shooting occurred before the incident, which he has proven by pointing out times in the Defendant's video. Plaintiff counsel has said that the times are invalid because the Plaintiff is not in EST, yet this is false as we have evidence proving that the Plaintiff is in EST timezone and I think the counsel simply does not know. Would we be able to present this evidence or would you be able to compel the Plaintiff to disclose his timezone as this is vital?
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:00 p.m.
Let me just say
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:02 p.m.
The shooting prior to the incident will only really matter by way of determining punitive damages
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:03 p.m.
Understood
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:03 p.m.
So can we present evidence detailing that the Plaintiff was in EST timezone and therefore the shooting took place prior to the incident, or can you compel the Plaintiff to disclose his timezone at the time?
huddy.So can we present evidence detailing that the Plaintiff was in EST timezone and therefore the shooting took place prior to the incident, or can you compel the Plaintiff to disclose...
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:06 p.m.
I’d prefer if this episode gets wrapped up sooner rather than later
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:06 p.m.
Personally I’ve heard enough about this prior incident
sadoimpactoI’d prefer if this episode gets wrapped up sooner rather than later
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:12 p.m.
sir with all due respect I am awful at interpreting subtle messages
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:12 p.m.
is that an A or a B or a None
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:13 p.m.
It means you can certainly present evidence, but I definitely don't want to hear it
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:13 p.m.
Not on this side track
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:26 p.m.
Oh lmao ok thanks
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:26 p.m.
Well let’s move on from this side track then
huddy. 2025-03-26 05:26 p.m.
Unless @Dark Stranger has more random questions
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 05:28 p.m.
In that case, no further questions your honor
huddy.Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 05:29 p.m.
"Defendant is trying to ruin the...."
"....times in the Defendant's video."
@huddy. Its called "Plaintiff" btw
"....times in the Defendant's video."
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:31 p.m.
Okay
meowiitten 2025-03-26 05:31 p.m.
Any more witnesses?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-26 05:33 p.m.
Not from Plaintiff's side, Your Honor
huddy. 2025-03-27 10:42 a.m.
None from us
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 11:07 a.m.@meowiitten
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 11:09 a.m.
Your Honor, for the record, the Plaintiff does present all the Exhibits A to C to the court as evidence.
Dark StrangerYour Honor, for the record, the Plaintiff does present all the Exhibits A to C to the court as evidence.
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:36 p.m.
Well no
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:36 p.m.
Not how that works
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:36 p.m.
If you didn't present it during the trial, then I cannot use it in my determinations
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:37 p.m.@Dark Stranger Begin your closing statements when you are ready
sadoimpactoWell no
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 02:49 p.m.
Trial is not over
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 02:49 p.m.
We just finished witnesses
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 02:49 p.m.
Trial gets over after closing statements
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:49 p.m.
What?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 02:50 p.m.
We only finished witness examinations, how is the trial over ?
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:50 p.m.
You still have closing statements to do
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:51 p.m.
Do you think you're just allowed to present exhibits to me without a witness to lay foundation for it?
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:51 p.m.
If you didn't present it during examinations, then it can't be used
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:51 p.m.
And I can't use it in my deliberations
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:51 p.m.
Whatever you didn't use from your discovery is unavailable for me
meowiitten 2025-03-27 02:53 p.m.@Dark Stranger Are you going to begin?
sadoimpactoDark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:07 p.m.
I am studying rn for my exam tmrw
Dark StrangerI am studying rn for my exam tmrw
meowiitten 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
So then I expect you to give me a time
meowiitten 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
You don't just say "wellllllll"
meowiitten 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
If you can't do it now, give me a time
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
I will start with my closing statement by tmrw this time
meowiitten 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
Alright
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:08 p.m.
however
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:25 p.m.@meowiitten are exhibits already not in considerations since James did present the exhibit to witnesses a couple of times ?
huddy. 2025-03-27 03:32 p.m.
?
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-27 03:55 p.m.
I don't know what you mean
huddy.Your Honor I'd like to present this exhibit to the Defendant.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:55 p.m.@meowiitten James presented Exhibit A to the plaintiff
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 03:56 p.m.
I believe that the court shall therefore take this exhibit into consideration
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:01 p.m.
Well first of all
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:02 p.m.
No one even asked me to enter any exhibits onto the record
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:02 p.m.
Which is what you are supposed to do
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:02 p.m.
But I let it slide, because if I didn't, then there would be nothing at all on the record besides testimony
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:02 p.m.
Does that mean the court will consider exhibit A ?
Dark StrangerDoes that mean the court will consider exhibit A ?
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:05 p.m.
That's the video, yes? Did you ever present Exhibit A to a witness?
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:05 p.m.
Or only on cross-examination
sadoimpactoThat's the video, yes? Did you ever present Exhibit A to a witness?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:06 p.m.
No I did not
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:06 p.m.
And yes Exhibit A is a video
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:07 p.m.
Exhibit B & C are enlargements from the video showcasing the defendant and witness rebelpilot09 during the event
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:08 p.m.
Why didn't you use Exhibit A during the trial?
sadoimpactoWhy didn't you use Exhibit A during the trial?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:09 p.m.
I thought I could present it seperately
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:09 p.m.
I was not aware that it had to submitted while witness examination
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:11 p.m.
You had the opportunity to present Exhibit A during your case-in-chief, or to object when the opposing party introduced a portion of it
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:12 p.m.
Frankly if you didn't know how to advocate at the examination stage, you should've told your client that and not brought this case
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:12 p.m.
I'm going to also incorporate FRE Rule 106 (MRE is silent) really quickly, because this speaks on the matter of admission relevant to these circumstances
If a party introduces all or part of a statement, an adverse party may require the introduction,at that time , of any other part — or any other statement — that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:13 p.m.
Did you ask for Exhibit A to be introduced in full, "at that time" it was put before the witness? No
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:13 p.m.
But I will say this to both of you
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:13 p.m.@Dark Stranger Don't even respond
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:13 p.m.
I don't want a response
meowiitten 2025-03-27 04:24 p.m.
I don't know whether the reason why this trial was so poor was because of incompetence — I hope not — or just because each of you are new; but I know that neither of you are new. I'm not saying I was the perfect one in this case, because I never can be, but I've had to back up questonings that began with improper foundation, constantly correct the behavior of counsel, and call my own witnesses just to address facts that should've been brought to my attention before we hit trial.
The most glaring example was a possible conflict of interest that the defendant's lawyer had with an impeachment witness — a witness that I called to make sure that the defendant had not perjured himself.
Now, on part of the Plaintiff's counsel, I'm having to incorporate evidence that should've been admitted way, way, way before this moment just so I can understand this case better and actually come to a coherent decision. So, Exhibit A will be admitted in full for use as a matter of fairness. But this is really where my patience ends.
@Dark Stranger I hope you will have your opening statements to me by 7:00 PM EDT on 3/28/25, because I'm not going to wait after that.
The most glaring example was a possible conflict of interest that the defendant's lawyer had with an impeachment witness — a witness that I called to make sure that the defendant had not perjured himself.
Now, on part of the Plaintiff's counsel, I'm having to incorporate evidence that should've been admitted way, way, way before this moment just so I can understand this case better and actually come to a coherent decision. So, Exhibit A will be admitted in full for use as a matter of fairness. But this is really where my patience ends.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 04:26 p.m.
You will have my closing statements by that time, Your Honor.
huddy. 2025-03-27 05:50 p.m.
Your semester ended 3 days ago and you have exams tomorrow?
huddy.Your semester ended 3 days ago and you have exams tomorrow?
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:07 p.m.
Last working day of my semester was on 21st
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:07 p.m.
and my exam starts on 28th
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:08 p.m.
yes
Dark Stranger 2025-03-27 06:08 p.m.
Universities does not work same way all around the globe buddy
huddy. 2025-03-27 06:08 p.m.
Oh yeah forgot abt north korea
Dark Stranger 2025-03-28 03:16 p.m.
Your Honor,
We are at the end of this trial. The defendant made an unsupported claim that the plaintiff killed him before the events in the video. However, the video evidence we have presented shows exactly what happened, the plaintiff, having been previously attacked by the defendant, followed him to the billboard to ask about that prior encounter. There is no evidence of any killing before the incident in question, and the defendant's claims are nothing more than an attempt to justify his own violent actions.
Even if we were to entertain the defendant's story about a prior encounter, that does not give him the right to escalate things again. The plaintiff, as shown in the video, was not threatening the defendant when the defendant chose to act violently.There was no immediate threat to his safety, no self-defense in that moment. Later at the Car Dealership, the Plaintiff was literally enjoying his popcorns when the defendant started attacking him again, ultimately leading to Plaintiff's death.
The defendant failed to provide any credible evidence to support his claims. His actions were not self-defense, and they ultimately led to the attack we see on film.
In conclusion, Your Honor, the defendant's claims do not hold up under scrutiny. The plaintiff’s actions were justified in seeking answers, and the defendant’s subsequent aggression was unwarranted. We ask that you find in favor of the plaintiff, NexussOmega, and hold the defendant accountable for his actions.
Thank you.
We are at the end of this trial. The defendant made an unsupported claim that the plaintiff killed him before the events in the video. However, the video evidence we have presented shows exactly what happened, the plaintiff, having been previously attacked by the defendant, followed him to the billboard to ask about that prior encounter. There is no evidence of any killing before the incident in question, and the defendant's claims are nothing more than an attempt to justify his own violent actions.
Even if we were to entertain the defendant's story about a prior encounter, that does not give him the right to escalate things again. The plaintiff, as shown in the video, was not threatening the defendant when the defendant chose to act violently.
The defendant failed to provide any credible evidence to support his claims. His actions were not self-defense, and they ultimately led to the attack we see on film.
In conclusion, Your Honor, the defendant's claims do not hold up under scrutiny. The plaintiff’s actions were justified in seeking answers, and the defendant’s subsequent aggression was unwarranted. We ask that you find in favor of the plaintiff, NexussOmega, and hold the defendant accountable for his actions.
Thank you.
CC:@meowiitten @huddy.
meowiitten 2025-03-28 04:18 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-28 04:41 p.m.
Your Honor, this case is a flawed case.
Let’s be clear about what happened. The plaintiff was the one who initiated this entire chain of events. He ran into my client in a closed space, on top of a billboard, creating a chaotic and dangerous situation. In that moment, my client, startled and cornered, reacted in self-defense. The plaintiff’s reckless actions placed them both in harm’s way, and my client was left with no choice but to defend himself.
Now, let’s address the second incident. I won’t stand here and deny that my client struck the plaintiff again. But you must consider why. We have a credible witness who testified that the plaintiff had previously killed my client. My client was feeling shock, anger and fear. His actions were not calculated or malicious but they were driven by an overwhelming emotion due to the Plaintiff's prior actions, by the heat of passion. This was not premeditated violence. It was a natural human reaction to being wronged in the most extreme way imaginable.
The Plaintiff may ask you to focus only on the second incident, to view it in isolation. But you cannot ignore the full context. You cannot ignore the fact that it was the plaintiff who set these events in motion by charging at my client. You cannot ignore the witness testimony revealing the plaintiff’s previous deadly attack. My client is not a cold-blooded aggressor but he is someone who was cornered, threatened, and ultimately overcome by the human emotion.
I ask you to see the full picture. My client is not asking for your sympathy—he is asking for your fairness. The evidence shows he was provoked. He acted in the heat of the moment, not with premeditation or malice. Therefore, I urge you to find my client not not liable of the counts alleged of him.
Let’s be clear about what happened. The plaintiff was the one who initiated this entire chain of events. He ran into my client in a closed space, on top of a billboard, creating a chaotic and dangerous situation. In that moment, my client, startled and cornered, reacted in self-defense. The plaintiff’s reckless actions placed them both in harm’s way, and my client was left with no choice but to defend himself.
Now, let’s address the second incident. I won’t stand here and deny that my client struck the plaintiff again. But you must consider why. We have a credible witness who testified that the plaintiff had previously killed my client. My client was feeling shock, anger and fear. His actions were not calculated or malicious but they were driven by an overwhelming emotion due to the Plaintiff's prior actions, by the heat of passion. This was not premeditated violence. It was a natural human reaction to being wronged in the most extreme way imaginable.
The Plaintiff may ask you to focus only on the second incident, to view it in isolation. But you cannot ignore the full context. You cannot ignore the fact that it was the plaintiff who set these events in motion by charging at my client. You cannot ignore the witness testimony revealing the plaintiff’s previous deadly attack. My client is not a cold-blooded aggressor but he is someone who was cornered, threatened, and ultimately overcome by the human emotion.
I ask you to see the full picture. My client is not asking for your sympathy—he is asking for your fairness. The evidence shows he was provoked. He acted in the heat of the moment, not with premeditation or malice. Therefore, I urge you to find my client not not liable of the counts alleged of him.
huddy. 2025-03-28 04:41 p.m.
Sorry I should ping @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-28 04:41 p.m.@Dark Stranger Rebuttal
Dark Stranger 2025-03-28 08:25 p.m.
Your Honor, I respectfully submit that the defense’s argument is built on a foundation of assumptions and emotional appeals rather than facts and evidence.
First, the claim that the plaintiff was responsible for initiating the incident on the billboard lacks any real merit. The video clearly shows that the plaintiff was not aggressively approaching the defendant but simply seeking answers about the prior engagement. There was no immediate threat to the defendant's safety. The defendant, by choosing to escalate the situation, created an environment of fear and danger where none was necessary.
As for the defense’s assertion of prior actions by the plaintiff, that claim is speculative at best. The defendant has failed to provide solid proof of this alleged event. We cannot allow unfounded accusations to dictate the course of justice. Without credible evidence, the defense’s claim should be disregarded. It's basically their word against ours, because the Plaintiff testified that nothing of such sort happened, however, on the contrary it was defendant who hit Plaintiff with crowbar during their earlier engagement. And it is shown by the Plaintiff asking Defendant about this in the video evidence when the Plaintiff spotted the Defendant.
The defense attempts to excuse the defendant’s actions by citing emotional distress, but the law does not allow for violent responses based solely on emotions, especially when there is no provocation or threat in the moment. The defendant was not cornered, nor was there a legitimate reason for his violent behavior. The video footage is clear, and the plaintiff’s actions in that moment were not threatening.
In conclusion, Your Honor, the defendant’s attempt to justify his actions based on emotions and a lack of credible evidence must be rejected. The facts are clear: the defendant’s violence was unprovoked and unwarranted. We ask that you hold him accountable for his actions and find in favor of the plaintiff, NexussOmega.
Thank you.
First, the claim that the plaintiff was responsible for initiating the incident on the billboard lacks any real merit. The video clearly shows that the plaintiff was not aggressively approaching the defendant but simply seeking answers about the prior engagement. There was no immediate threat to the defendant's safety. The defendant, by choosing to escalate the situation, created an environment of fear and danger where none was necessary.
As for the defense’s assertion of prior actions by the plaintiff, that claim is speculative at best. The defendant has failed to provide solid proof of this alleged event. We cannot allow unfounded accusations to dictate the course of justice. Without credible evidence, the defense’s claim should be disregarded. It's basically their word against ours, because the Plaintiff testified that nothing of such sort happened, however, on the contrary it was defendant who hit Plaintiff with crowbar during their earlier engagement. And it is shown by the Plaintiff asking Defendant about this in the video evidence when the Plaintiff spotted the Defendant.
The defense attempts to excuse the defendant’s actions by citing emotional distress, but the law does not allow for violent responses based solely on emotions, especially when there is no provocation or threat in the moment. The defendant was not cornered, nor was there a legitimate reason for his violent behavior. The video footage is clear, and the plaintiff’s actions in that moment were not threatening.
In conclusion, Your Honor, the defendant’s attempt to justify his actions based on emotions and a lack of credible evidence must be rejected. The facts are clear: the defendant’s violence was unprovoked and unwarranted. We ask that you hold him accountable for his actions and find in favor of the plaintiff, NexussOmega.
Thank you.
Dark Stranger 2025-03-28 08:26 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-03-28 08:27 p.m.
Alright
meowiitten 2025-03-28 08:27 p.m.
We are adjourned
meowiitten 2025-03-28 08:27 p.m.
Thank you counsel
meowiitten 2025-03-28 08:27 p.m.
I will begin my deliberations
sadoimpactoI will begin my deliberations
Dark Stranger 2025-03-28 08:47 p.m.
When can we expect ruling, Your Honor ?
meowiitten 2025-03-28 09:04 p.m.
At least a few days
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:45 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:45 p.m.@meowiitten Can you continue to be Plaintiff and initiate a civil suit whilst banned forever from the community?
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:45 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346596491485118626/1352362963507613796 This is something on the matter
Dark Stranger 2025-03-30 04:50 p.m.@meowiitten the Plaintiff was banned after the incident, 2 days ago after the whole trial was almost over
Dark Stranger 2025-03-30 04:50 p.m.
He wants me to get money on his behalf
Dark Strangermeowiitten 2025-03-31 10:44 a.m.
If he’s permanently banned then this case is over
meowiitten 2025-03-31 10:44 a.m.
Especially since he exploited
meowiitten 2025-03-31 10:44 a.m.
That’s his fault
sadoimpactoIf he’s permanently banned then this case is over
huddy. 2025-03-31 10:55 a.m.
do we have to file an MTD or will you rule?
meowiitten 2025-03-31 11:03 a.m.
I’m waiting for dark to reply to me
sadoimpactoIf he’s permanently banned then this case is over
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 11:59 a.m.
Actually, he says he did not exploit and is trying to appeal it
Dark Stranger 2025-03-31 12:01 p.m.
I also think it'd be a complete waste if we just dismiss this case after such a long trial just bcs he got banned
meowiitten 2025-03-31 12:03 p.m.
Well we’re gonna wait until he gets the result of his appeal
huddy. 2025-04-01 02:36 a.m.@meowiitten
huddy. 2025-04-01 02:36 a.m. 
huddy. 2025-04-01 02:41 a.m. 
meowiitten 2025-04-03 09:38 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 4/3/2025.
@huddy. @Dark Stranger
meowiitten used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:38 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @huddy. from the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:38 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @Dark Stranger from the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:39 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:39 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1357529951682826443 Successfully created transcript.
meowiitten 2025-04-03 09:39 p.m.@Prothonotary's Office Archive!
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:46 p.m.
Exported 1145 messages